{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO","short_pith_number":"pith:3O75M47W","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"dbbfd673f66574012fb264eff687e85380ea88ed330e1b7069aacbb1f6211361","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.15614","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When Redistribution Becomes a State Variable: Monetary-Fiscal Stabilization with Type-Specific Sticky Wages","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Type-specific sticky wages turn redistribution into a persistent state variable requiring history-dependent fiscal transfers.","cross_cats":["q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"econ.GN","authors_text":"Kenji Miyazaki","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T04:51:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many tractable TANK models treat redistribution as a contemporaneous wedge. I show that this view is incomplete once wage contracts are type-specific. In a tractable Two-Agent New Keynesian model, each household type adjusts its nominal wage relative to its own previous wage. This own-lag contract makes the cross-type wage gap a payoff-relevant distributional state variable. The wage gap follows a second-order expectational law of motion and feeds back into aggregate demand through consumption dispersion. Inflation stabilization or contemporaneous profit-wedge neutralization therefore generall"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.15614","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"econ.GN","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T04:51:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-fin.EC"],"title_canon_sha256":"0cd2bb7ab2afd0ad748a1361e790a00edf4cd8205d77ee16402e7adfc45d41a4","abstract_canon_sha256":"6d2526104ebe55983774f87f57ec9e2c7c1a70860df1ab7673502b626641f830"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216779Z","signature_b64":"b5vY9s9HcnAB7VLBtztQpBBYF1jr3zx8hLJfcm5wdbCNYAEiAJjX1mEkkKhJ8CQ1fSxIPHYeFZs1+RlzpZRlBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"dbbfd673f66574012fb264eff687e85380ea88ed330e1b7069aacbb1f6211361","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.215920Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.215920Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When Redistribution Becomes a State Variable: Monetary-Fiscal Stabilization with Type-Specific Sticky Wages","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Type-specific sticky wages turn redistribution into a persistent state variable requiring history-dependent fiscal transfers.","cross_cats":["q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"econ.GN","authors_text":"Kenji Miyazaki","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T04:51:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many tractable TANK models treat redistribution as a contemporaneous wedge. I show that this view is incomplete once wage contracts are type-specific. In a tractable Two-Agent New Keynesian model, each household type adjusts its nominal wage relative to its own previous wage. This own-lag contract makes the cross-type wage gap a payoff-relevant distributional state variable. The wage gap follows a second-order expectational law of motion and feeds back into aggregate demand through consumption dispersion. Inflation stabilization or contemporaneous profit-wedge neutralization therefore generall"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Inflation stabilization or contemporaneous profit-wedge neutralization generally fails to restore the corresponding representative-agent allocation. Under the maintained commitment benchmark, RANK-equivalent stabilization from period t=1 onward requires history-dependent transfers that respond to inherited wage dispersion, not only current profits.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The assumption that each household type adjusts its nominal wage relative to its own previous wage (own-lag contract), which makes the cross-type wage gap a payoff-relevant distributional state variable that follows a second-order expectational law of motion.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"In a TANK model with type-specific sticky wages, the cross-type wage gap emerges as a second-order state variable requiring history-dependent transfers for RANK-equivalent stabilization.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Type-specific sticky wages turn redistribution into a persistent state variable requiring history-dependent fiscal transfers.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"e8c52f8ff79cec1ff24504e84afd7c848be270c3305b1d0292b73b4244fba1b1"},"source":{"id":"2605.15614","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"656731dc-039c-4b27-87a3-d7f97260d8ae","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T19:53:35.345553Z","strongest_claim":"Inflation stabilization or contemporaneous profit-wedge neutralization generally fails to restore the corresponding representative-agent allocation. Under the maintained commitment benchmark, RANK-equivalent stabilization from period t=1 onward requires history-dependent transfers that respond to inherited wage dispersion, not only current profits.","one_line_summary":"In a TANK model with type-specific sticky wages, the cross-type wage gap emerges as a second-order state variable requiring history-dependent transfers for RANK-equivalent stabilization.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The assumption that each household type adjusts its nominal wage relative to its own previous wage (own-lag contract), which makes the cross-type wage gap a payoff-relevant distributional state variable that follows a second-order expectational law of motion.","pith_extraction_headline":"Type-specific sticky wages turn redistribution into a persistent state variable requiring history-dependent fiscal transfers."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.15614/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T20:01:42.878883Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T20:01:19.284844Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:34:34.618115Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T17:41:56.043160Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"9d6e1141fffb2bf61a92705276cdf7dcd3c4c60bd4a0e46938ad0da8e191def9"},"references":{"count":32,"sample":[{"doi":"10.1257/aer.20200239","year":2023,"title":"Acharya, Sushant, Édouard Challe, and Keshav Dogra. 2023. ``Optimal Monetary Policy According to HANK.'' American Economic Review 113 (7): 1741--82. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200239","work_id":"09163b1a-2a60-4d79-85f9-ac8734d5c7c8","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.53479/36473","year":2024,"title":"Adamopoulou, Effrosyni, Luis Díez-Catalán, and Ernesto Villanueva. 2024. Staggered Contracts and Unemployment During Recessions. Working Paper. Banco de Espa ñ a. https://doi.org/10.53479/36473","work_id":"2e43c970-8335-4976-a6ec-6b8054f87c1f","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1111/ecin.12424","year":2017,"title":"greedflation conundrum","work_id":"ba9bfbfa-9a02-4c3b-866d-01a918628001","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1257/aer.20160137","year":2019,"title":"Auclert, Adrien. 2019. ``Monetary Policy and the Redistribution Channel.'' American Economic Review 109 (6): 2333--67. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160137","work_id":"a289175e-1e38-46ec-b690-5f45a5b7481a","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01072","year":2023,"title":"Auclert, Adrien, Bence Bardóczy, and Matthew Rognlie. 2023. ``MPCs, MPEs, and Multipliers: A Trilemma for New Keynesian Models.'' The Review of Economics and Statistics 105 (3): 700--712. https://doi.","work_id":"b8f32945-9da3-425e-a3f7-4d775e2b5594","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":32,"snapshot_sha256":"af0dc8230fe3ec2c5f49a290bfea5a2643f2b9e5e9cd850d69c9b427c4b01f3c","internal_anchors":1},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"5bb31206b499c12189659e67e3e1b6be81ed7f4802280b13adefa6323687dfc7"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.15614","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216047+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.15614v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216047+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.15614","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216047+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3O75M47WMV2A","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216047+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3O75M47WMV2ACL5S","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216047+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3O75M47W","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216047+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3O75M47W"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3O75M47W","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.15614&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3O75M47WMV2ACL5SMTX7NB7IKO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216047+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:08.216047+00:00"}