{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE","short_pith_number":"pith:3P6O2RMO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"dbfced458ed31e20a9be7257eb6aeb11361f61d6990f782330f8bda632a73edf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.11125","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conversational Agents as Catalysts for Critical Thinking: Challenging Design Fixation in Group Design","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Kyungho Lee, Seoyeong Hwang, Soohwan Lee","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T00:53:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper investigates the potential of LLM-based conversational agents (CAs) to enhance critical reflection and mitigate design fixation in group design work. By challenging AI-generated recommendations and prevailing group opinions, these agents address issues such as groupthink and promote a more dynamic and inclusive design process. Key design considerations include optimizing intervention timing, ensuring clarity in counterarguments, and balancing critical thinking with designers' satisfaction. CAs can also adapt to various roles, supporting individual and collective reflection. Our work"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.11125","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T00:53:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"50d82004881877c3c4388698a25016d92a8ac3111c8ac0df2fa4d620c368b288","abstract_canon_sha256":"b8107961e010fe146a9ba3df659e3cfc9a636c9e10ab90b48b87f9ad9454130d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.224059Z","signature_b64":"YNwzGLB3+LEsAvPqN7jd8in0ssA0YgAOhqeijdUXm/V+6tZ5naaIiXtAIur+EmZmqLmVpeD2qicUtx5q/fIvDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"dbfced458ed31e20a9be7257eb6aeb11361f61d6990f782330f8bda632a73edf","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223717Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223717Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conversational Agents as Catalysts for Critical Thinking: Challenging Design Fixation in Group Design","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Kyungho Lee, Seoyeong Hwang, Soohwan Lee","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T00:53:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper investigates the potential of LLM-based conversational agents (CAs) to enhance critical reflection and mitigate design fixation in group design work. By challenging AI-generated recommendations and prevailing group opinions, these agents address issues such as groupthink and promote a more dynamic and inclusive design process. Key design considerations include optimizing intervention timing, ensuring clarity in counterarguments, and balancing critical thinking with designers' satisfaction. CAs can also adapt to various roles, supporting individual and collective reflection. Our work"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.11125","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.11125/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.11125","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223774+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.11125v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223774+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.11125","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223774+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3P6O2RMO2MPC","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223774+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223774+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3P6O2RMO","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223774+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.05870","citing_title":"Understanding Design Fixation in Generative AI","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3P6O2RMO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3P6O2RMO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.11125&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3P6O2RMO2MPCBKN6OJL6W2XLCE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223774+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:32:49.223774+00:00"}