{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E","short_pith_number":"pith:3PP7ZOYG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"dbdffcbb06ffa96c6680bbff3a6d36f92bacdaa170ab6e4f6ceefb522fdc25c0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2103.04277","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for General Responses","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Trevor Hastie, Zijun Gao","submitted_at":"2021-03-07T05:40:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Heterogeneous treatment effect models allow us to compare treatments at subgroup and individual levels, and are of increasing popularity in applications like personalized medicine, advertising, and education. In this talk, we first survey different causal estimands used in practice, which focus on estimating the difference in conditional means. We then propose DINA, the difference in natural parameters, to quantify heterogeneous treatment effect in exponential families and the Cox model. For binary outcomes and survival times, DINA is both convenient and more practical for modeling the influen"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2103.04277","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2021-03-07T05:40:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4c3f2a45285c27f5f524bac8d5b25c996038ff15bc0ca94bb45f49ea93a6f0e7","abstract_canon_sha256":"e8ec79e4a22c43e53968791eb9cf33d9625dde8cce20d27614214af9b4d2fede"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.737232Z","signature_b64":"uSDTVIS4XKE1qMhMgHdyvPSxGk0P0iRv59773HkS3Paqbx+v3pGqTMZXolWaqqpLXU5+iky7GY5MWqUJMUfgAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"dbdffcbb06ffa96c6680bbff3a6d36f92bacdaa170ab6e4f6ceefb522fdc25c0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736766Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736766Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for General Responses","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Trevor Hastie, Zijun Gao","submitted_at":"2021-03-07T05:40:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Heterogeneous treatment effect models allow us to compare treatments at subgroup and individual levels, and are of increasing popularity in applications like personalized medicine, advertising, and education. In this talk, we first survey different causal estimands used in practice, which focus on estimating the difference in conditional means. We then propose DINA, the difference in natural parameters, to quantify heterogeneous treatment effect in exponential families and the Cox model. For binary outcomes and survival times, DINA is both convenient and more practical for modeling the influen"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2103.04277","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2103.04277/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2103.04277","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736823+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2103.04277v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736823+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2103.04277","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736823+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3PP7ZOYG76UW","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736823+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUA","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736823+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3PP7ZOYG","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736823+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.07295","citing_title":"Targeted Regularization for Causal Effect Estimation with Exponential Dispersion Family Outcomes","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18459","citing_title":"Adaptive Experimentation for Censored Survival Outcomes","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.13397","citing_title":"Assessing the robustness of heterogeneous treatment effects in survival analysis under informative censoring","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3PP7ZOYG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3PP7ZOYG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2103.04277&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3PP7ZOYG76UWYZUAXP7TU3JW7E/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736823+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:51:54.736823+00:00"}