{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76","short_pith_number":"pith:3Q7ONQ3C","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"dc3ee6c3626a4db1b818565fd9b4ebffaa88c9bf559afca563c6c49994ab3d54","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.08909","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards Automated Fact-Checking of Real-World Claims: Exploring Task Formulation and Assessment with LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Iffat Maab, Jawan Kolanowski, Junichi Yamagishi, Premtim Sahitaj, Sebastian M\\\"oller, Vera Schmitt","submitted_at":"2025-02-13T02:51:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fact-checking is necessary to address the increasing volume of misinformation. Traditional fact-checking relies on manual analysis to verify claims, but it is slow and resource-intensive. This study establishes baseline comparisons for Automated Fact-Checking (AFC) using Large Language Models (LLMs) across multiple labeling schemes (binary, three-class, five-class) and extends traditional claim verification by incorporating analysis, verdict classification, and explanation in a structured setup to provide comprehensive justifications for real-world claims. We evaluate Llama-3 models of varying"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.08909","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-13T02:51:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"92f0a4649d4c6278b43d5255bb0e8292519b841657529ab28026092be7c6b0a4","abstract_canon_sha256":"0cbceb20fcf7a1f4f99449983cc26ee6db2058517f6d4c369beb3d1b6e17a412"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.567387Z","signature_b64":"5tnkP35frPUeHxaBWyu6y5CLolT/MyIG/vRG4NlmXMrQT5UB8/Q0GWM4ckSu87PBgj+rY+9bEyWzXFumO0iiBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"dc3ee6c3626a4db1b818565fd9b4ebffaa88c9bf559afca563c6c49994ab3d54","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566894Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566894Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards Automated Fact-Checking of Real-World Claims: Exploring Task Formulation and Assessment with LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Iffat Maab, Jawan Kolanowski, Junichi Yamagishi, Premtim Sahitaj, Sebastian M\\\"oller, Vera Schmitt","submitted_at":"2025-02-13T02:51:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fact-checking is necessary to address the increasing volume of misinformation. Traditional fact-checking relies on manual analysis to verify claims, but it is slow and resource-intensive. This study establishes baseline comparisons for Automated Fact-Checking (AFC) using Large Language Models (LLMs) across multiple labeling schemes (binary, three-class, five-class) and extends traditional claim verification by incorporating analysis, verdict classification, and explanation in a structured setup to provide comprehensive justifications for real-world claims. We evaluate Llama-3 models of varying"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.08909","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.08909/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.08909","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.08909v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.08909","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3Q7ONQ3CNJG3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566945+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3Q7ONQ3C","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566945+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06006","citing_title":"From Articles to Premises: Building PrimeFacts, an Extraction Methodology and Resource for Fact-Checking Evidence","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3Q7ONQ3C"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3Q7ONQ3C","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.08909&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3Q7ONQ3CNJG3DOAYKZP5TNHL76/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566945+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:49.566945+00:00"}