{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ","short_pith_number":"pith:3SUSSRKY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"dca9294558c7c0e5a56000e34d780f367674e586cd8340e970b4bee3479f38b4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.00202","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Generalized Universal Inference on Risk Minimizers","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Jonathan P. Williams, Neil Dey, Ryan Martin","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T21:54:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"A common goal in statistics and machine learning is estimation of unknowns. Point estimates alone are of little value without an accompanying measure of uncertainty, but traditional uncertainty quantification methods, such as confidence sets and p-values, often require distributional or structural assumptions that may not be justified in modern applications. The present paper considers a very common case in machine learning, where the quantity of interest is the minimizer of a given risk (expected loss) function. We propose a generalization of universal inference specifically designed for infe"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.00202","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T21:54:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"14e563c7275e9ebbf2af3476d45704962f3acd9b3e3c6099a3db9cb69e7ca303","abstract_canon_sha256":"4e6e34d8bcb6d2fb42d951fee8ec34ed9c137fe1dd0e635d51e8aa272b726330"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766965Z","signature_b64":"7vv1507kFAQnL56n7zTihRdjzrFG0657LPKCdDhGhqP4Oeti2zTLX09DCggq3II0jIOVf0QDX2Ai/4d1cCEMDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"dca9294558c7c0e5a56000e34d780f367674e586cd8340e970b4bee3479f38b4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766400Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766400Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Generalized Universal Inference on Risk Minimizers","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Jonathan P. Williams, Neil Dey, Ryan Martin","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T21:54:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"A common goal in statistics and machine learning is estimation of unknowns. Point estimates alone are of little value without an accompanying measure of uncertainty, but traditional uncertainty quantification methods, such as confidence sets and p-values, often require distributional or structural assumptions that may not be justified in modern applications. The present paper considers a very common case in machine learning, where the quantity of interest is the minimizer of a given risk (expected loss) function. We propose a generalization of universal inference specifically designed for infe"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.00202","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.00202/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.00202","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766460+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.00202v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766460+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.00202","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766460+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3SUSSRKYY7AO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766460+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLA","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766460+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3SUSSRKY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766460+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2410.01427","citing_title":"Regularized e-processes: anytime valid inference with knowledge-based efficiency gains","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3SUSSRKY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3SUSSRKY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.00202&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3SUSSRKYY7AOLJLAADRU26APGZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766460+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:14.766460+00:00"}