{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA","short_pith_number":"pith:3SZFULCK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"dcb25a2c4af97f8fa1dd9c3321ce26c01f5e9db46fe5cbefaea683d9b167343e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.14634","version":7},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Daniel S. Weld, Marissa Radensky, Pao Siangliulue, Raymond Fok, Simra Shahid, Tom Hope","submitted_at":"2024-09-23T00:09:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"The scientific ideation process often involves blending facets of existing papers to create new ideas. We contribute Scideator, the first human-LLM system for facet-based scientific ideation. Starting from user-provided papers, Scideator extracts key facets -- purposes, mechanisms, and evaluations -- from these and related papers, allowing users to interactively recombine facets to synthesize ideas. Scideator is driven by three design choices: (1) human-in-the-loop facet recombination, in which users select facets from retrieved papers and the system generates ideas by finding analogies across"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.14634","kind":"arxiv","version":7},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-09-23T00:09:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"9510a76c19cd0baf2f4c507ed84f25d8f784f02a9953fb4b9e32dc9446b18a51","abstract_canon_sha256":"bab425cd1c4c81f13e1e9da2a1b06b82420129879ffc6fc630775d067420af7e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.055462Z","signature_b64":"phxkwTdKdwc2ZXJj0yAqxA49lg3ERmkq9P2UAzw76dHa+XzHu9/My5Aj9zf+XT9S+iOtliZo8b3MVHukHLFiDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"dcb25a2c4af97f8fa1dd9c3321ce26c01f5e9db46fe5cbefaea683d9b167343e","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054918Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054918Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Daniel S. Weld, Marissa Radensky, Pao Siangliulue, Raymond Fok, Simra Shahid, Tom Hope","submitted_at":"2024-09-23T00:09:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"The scientific ideation process often involves blending facets of existing papers to create new ideas. We contribute Scideator, the first human-LLM system for facet-based scientific ideation. Starting from user-provided papers, Scideator extracts key facets -- purposes, mechanisms, and evaluations -- from these and related papers, allowing users to interactively recombine facets to synthesize ideas. Scideator is driven by three design choices: (1) human-in-the-loop facet recombination, in which users select facets from retrieved papers and the system generates ideas by finding analogies across"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.14634","kind":"arxiv","version":7},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.14634/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.14634","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054998+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.14634v7","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054998+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.14634","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054998+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3SZFULCK7F7Y","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054998+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054998+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3SZFULCK","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054998+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":12,"internal_anchor_count":12,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23204","citing_title":"AutoResearch AI: Towards AI-Powered Research Automation for Scientific Discovery","ref_index":100,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.01092","citing_title":"The Alien Space of Science: Sampling Coherent but Cognitively Unavailable Research Directions","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.20779","citing_title":"CHIMERA: A Knowledge Base of Scientific Idea Recombinations for Research Analysis and Ideation","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.11810","citing_title":"Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator","ref_index":144,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.15736","citing_title":"IDRBench: Understanding the Capability of Large Language Models on Interdisciplinary Research","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.00361","citing_title":"Attribution Gradients: Incrementally Unfolding Citations for Critical Examination of Attributed AI Answers","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13776","citing_title":"\"Like Taking the Path of Least Resistance\": Exploring the Impact of LLM Interaction on the Creative Process of Programming","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.02600","citing_title":"LitPivot: Developing Well-Situated Research Ideas Through Dynamic Contextualization and Critique within the Literature Landscape","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23593","citing_title":"When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04922","citing_title":"Evolving Idea Graphs with Learnable Edits-and-Commits for Multi-Agent Scientific Ideation","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11538","citing_title":"ResearchCube: Multi-Dimensional Trade-off Exploration for Research Ideation","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08898","citing_title":"Omakase: proactive assistance with actionable suggestions for evolving scientific research projects","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3SZFULCK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3SZFULCK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.14634&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3SZFULCK7F7Y7IO5TQZSDTRGYA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054998+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:47.054998+00:00"}