{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH","short_pith_number":"pith:3VRH33EN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"dd627dec8d66ff435dd6726798569979ebb22fab1ee7e5a1fadab51e603ee9eb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2012.11788","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Algorithmic Recourse in the Wild: Understanding the Impact of Data and Model Shifts","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ece Kamar, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Kaivalya Rawal","submitted_at":"2020-12-22T02:06:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"As predictive models are increasingly being deployed to make a variety of consequential decisions, there is a growing emphasis on designing algorithms that can provide recourse to affected individuals. Existing recourse algorithms function under the assumption that the underlying predictive model does not change. However, models are regularly updated in practice for several reasons including data distribution shifts. In this work, we make the first attempt at understanding how model updates resulting from data distribution shifts impact the algorithmic recourses generated by state-of-the-art a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2012.11788","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2020-12-22T02:06:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"37fb9f0260fb33d876f719379aee59c23d8250e2ca757d8c91123235c60528ca","abstract_canon_sha256":"be7eaeb50c27bddcfb3d66e75d2588187373674249356be5ebb59532527f324a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.572307Z","signature_b64":"1EV0TmneOA9Eq6Z7796xzyyQqa8mJFhXpGgvgNGQrbNK0pFUlNGcpFoksNCgYTAaT8oqlV/ViKRUrual+dxBCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"dd627dec8d66ff435dd6726798569979ebb22fab1ee7e5a1fadab51e603ee9eb","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571819Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571819Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Algorithmic Recourse in the Wild: Understanding the Impact of Data and Model Shifts","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ece Kamar, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Kaivalya Rawal","submitted_at":"2020-12-22T02:06:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"As predictive models are increasingly being deployed to make a variety of consequential decisions, there is a growing emphasis on designing algorithms that can provide recourse to affected individuals. Existing recourse algorithms function under the assumption that the underlying predictive model does not change. However, models are regularly updated in practice for several reasons including data distribution shifts. In this work, we make the first attempt at understanding how model updates resulting from data distribution shifts impact the algorithmic recourses generated by state-of-the-art a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2012.11788","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2012.11788/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2012.11788","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2012.11788v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2012.11788","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3VRH33ENM37U","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3VRH33ENM37UGXOW","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3VRH33EN","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571873+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17160","citing_title":"When Bits Break Recourse: Counterfactual-Faithful Quantization","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3VRH33EN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3VRH33EN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2012.11788&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3VRH33ENM37UGXOWOJTZQVUZPH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571873+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:52:27.571873+00:00"}