{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6","short_pith_number":"pith:3W4R3ZNW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ddb91de5b6401826b9230836dda7e3979a54407d9dcf26ff00341fdce9b984c4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1906.10726","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum Causal Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Jonathan Barrett, Ognyan Oreshkov, Robin Lorenz","submitted_at":"2019-06-25T19:02:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is known that the classical framework of causal models is not general enough to allow for causal reasoning about quantum systems. While the framework has been generalized in a variety of different ways to the quantum case, much of this work leaves open whether causal concepts are fundamental to quantum theory, or only find application at an emergent level of classical devices and measurement outcomes. Here, we present a framework of quantum causal models, with causal relations defined in terms intrinsic to quantum theory, and the central object of study being the quantum process itself. Fol"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1906.10726","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2019-06-25T19:02:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4fca606c71ea4157ff913957bd99e53592afeda98624a693f5283e591a4ccf93","abstract_canon_sha256":"51a07f0ecd23bc6d066ae23a29943034e53bf15dea99b48262811bd4e8d1a1f5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658704Z","signature_b64":"/hWXByFi4gInm5QQ5FyvHxQsExE3Htlvb29zyH2EXowHwCvOYLeFhOvylsL3Poaop9faXR4OCmKqIShtBODFCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ddb91de5b6401826b9230836dda7e3979a54407d9dcf26ff00341fdce9b984c4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658146Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658146Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum Causal Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Jonathan Barrett, Ognyan Oreshkov, Robin Lorenz","submitted_at":"2019-06-25T19:02:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is known that the classical framework of causal models is not general enough to allow for causal reasoning about quantum systems. While the framework has been generalized in a variety of different ways to the quantum case, much of this work leaves open whether causal concepts are fundamental to quantum theory, or only find application at an emergent level of classical devices and measurement outcomes. Here, we present a framework of quantum causal models, with causal relations defined in terms intrinsic to quantum theory, and the central object of study being the quantum process itself. Fol"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1906.10726","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1906.10726/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1906.10726","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1906.10726v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1906.10726","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3W4R3ZNWIAMC","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJD","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658213+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3W4R3ZNW","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658213+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23372","citing_title":"Bounding Classical and Quantum Correlations in Bayesian Networks with Quasiprobabilities","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.20476","citing_title":"Impossibility of superluminal signalling rules out causal loops in conical spacetimes","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04643","citing_title":"On the Conicality of Causally Simple, Future Cohesive Spacetimes","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2402.12446","citing_title":"Theories with no superluminal signaling have greater information-processing power than theories with no superluminal causation","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2403.00916","citing_title":"Characterizing Signalling: Connections between Causal Inference and Space-time Geometry","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07090","citing_title":"Decoherence without the state: A causal quantum Darwinist approach","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3W4R3ZNW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3W4R3ZNW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1906.10726&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3W4R3ZNWIAMCNOJDBA3N3J7DS6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658213+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:53:06.658213+00:00"}