{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6","short_pith_number":"pith:3ZHHNUBB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"de4e76d021def9d413a60148f2b1549fafb428fa1993796eaa12a393405063ed","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.06756","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can decaying vacuum solve the H_0 Tension?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"A. A. Escobal, J. F. Jesus, L. S. Brito, S. H. Pereira","submitted_at":"2024-12-09T18:46:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the present work we analyze two different models of interaction between dark energy and dark matter, also known as vacuum decay models or $\\Lambda(t)$CDM models. In both models, when the $H_0$ parameter is constrained by the Planck distance priors, its value is compatible with a higher value of $H_0$, in agreement with SH0ES data, while simultaneously reducing the values of $\\Omega_m$ and $\\Omega_b$. In both models, we find $H_0=73.1\\pm0.86$ at 68\\% c.l. by combining Planck+SH0ES data. We also find the decay parameter to be $\\varepsilon=0.0197^{+0.0032}_{-0.0027}$ for one model and $\\vareps"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.06756","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2024-12-09T18:46:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"8f06a5fd8415010909123cd9c12af1541143cdf50e35fbc2de39c8dbed5401ba","abstract_canon_sha256":"7ceb159f68a1eede02081fba7dc81c6d6eacf7fa144f4cd58d6fb2d7afd955c0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271566Z","signature_b64":"9FR8aD/apgQykGKad4SwlFSmWz/w7O23ql1RWx83ArbH7kZcKGoG0Sq7kppDjyEZtbgKp93wkT1sTT5GJTxsBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"de4e76d021def9d413a60148f2b1549fafb428fa1993796eaa12a393405063ed","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271036Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271036Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can decaying vacuum solve the H_0 Tension?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"A. A. Escobal, J. F. Jesus, L. S. Brito, S. H. Pereira","submitted_at":"2024-12-09T18:46:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the present work we analyze two different models of interaction between dark energy and dark matter, also known as vacuum decay models or $\\Lambda(t)$CDM models. In both models, when the $H_0$ parameter is constrained by the Planck distance priors, its value is compatible with a higher value of $H_0$, in agreement with SH0ES data, while simultaneously reducing the values of $\\Omega_m$ and $\\Omega_b$. In both models, we find $H_0=73.1\\pm0.86$ at 68\\% c.l. by combining Planck+SH0ES data. We also find the decay parameter to be $\\varepsilon=0.0197^{+0.0032}_{-0.0027}$ for one model and $\\vareps"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.06756","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.06756/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.06756","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271101+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.06756v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271101+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.06756","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271101+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3ZHHNUBB3345","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271101+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3ZHHNUBB3345IE5G","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271101+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3ZHHNUBB","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271101+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.22840","citing_title":"Redshift evolution of the Hubble constant: Constraints and new insights from an interacting dark energy model","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3ZHHNUBB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3ZHHNUBB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.06756&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3ZHHNUBB3345IE5GAFEPFMKUT6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271101+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:51.271101+00:00"}