{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO","short_pith_number":"pith:43DC32MS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e6c62de992f3da05933b783c6e2d75abb8175e8ef3d7e150e354b7395506e39c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2104.12488","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why does Schr\\\"odinger's cat refuse to be quantic","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.gen-ph","authors_text":"D-M. Cabaret, E. Perrier, T. Grandou","submitted_at":"2021-03-09T15:15:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Both at formal and philosophical levels, decades of efforts have been devoted to a deciphering of the `quantum enigma', the `crazy way quantum objects behave', to quote R.P. Feynman's words. We posit that the enigma cannot recede without resorting to a thorough questioning of the quantum ontology. In the current paper this questioning is introduced through a revisitation of the famous Schr\\\"odinger's cat paradox, and of the main attempts at solving it. Our proposal thereof, is that the quantum world enjoys a sound physical reality (complying, in particular, with the scientifc requirement of ex"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2104.12488","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.gen-ph","submitted_at":"2021-03-09T15:15:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.hist-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"bd2a9ed8a52ecf2078369b1cb6f908b00c0bd72fab770f23c575693b0fe02da7","abstract_canon_sha256":"acfe65718eca9064b0067a2d480a71dca9df2e3ab72d6e0744fbd4b198fb6a21"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953721Z","signature_b64":"n0Hbi02envBVGa4wCqzVgeAx/QjOGh3z3HFyUHl45XeqvOvBdHFNX3rSKIq0JHOjn1LhjVTGQI2PJ38IX7gTCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e6c62de992f3da05933b783c6e2d75abb8175e8ef3d7e150e354b7395506e39c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953252Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953252Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why does Schr\\\"odinger's cat refuse to be quantic","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.gen-ph","authors_text":"D-M. Cabaret, E. Perrier, T. Grandou","submitted_at":"2021-03-09T15:15:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Both at formal and philosophical levels, decades of efforts have been devoted to a deciphering of the `quantum enigma', the `crazy way quantum objects behave', to quote R.P. Feynman's words. We posit that the enigma cannot recede without resorting to a thorough questioning of the quantum ontology. In the current paper this questioning is introduced through a revisitation of the famous Schr\\\"odinger's cat paradox, and of the main attempts at solving it. Our proposal thereof, is that the quantum world enjoys a sound physical reality (complying, in particular, with the scientifc requirement of ex"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2104.12488","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2104.12488/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2104.12488","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953308+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2104.12488v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953308+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2104.12488","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953308+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"43DC32MS6PNA","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953308+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"43DC32MS6PNALEZ3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953308+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"43DC32MS","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953308+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.17858","citing_title":"Neither a field nor a matter: The case of energy","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/43DC32MS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/43DC32MS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2104.12488&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/43DC32MS6PNALEZ3PA6G4LLVVO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953308+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:43:20.953308+00:00"}