{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV","short_pith_number":"pith:44UHDV4A","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e72871d78014a263aaa32ab4df41255558ab996671cc4ec908f7bc8e2d0b12e5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1712.02302","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Which groups are amenable to proving exponent two for matrix multiplication?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DS","math.CO"],"primary_cat":"math.GR","authors_text":"Chris Umans, Henry Cohn, Jonah Blasiak, Joshua A. Grochow, Thomas Church","submitted_at":"2017-12-06T17:38:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Cohn-Umans group-theoretic approach to matrix multiplication suggests embedding matrix multiplication into group algebra multiplication, and bounding $\\omega$ in terms of the representation theory of the host group. This framework is general enough to capture the best known upper bounds on $\\omega$ and is conjectured to be powerful enough to prove $\\omega = 2$, although finding a suitable group and constructing such an embedding has remained elusive. Recently it was shown, by a generalization of the proof of the Cap Set Conjecture, that abelian groups of bounded exponent cannot prove $\\ome"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1712.02302","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.GR","submitted_at":"2017-12-06T17:38:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.DS","math.CO"],"title_canon_sha256":"eb5422ceeb503176892d8fd1bbf635c23da87fe0ca64038885979856f1894d82","abstract_canon_sha256":"ad270d223d24c6ab1104fba428a2081d1433b61cc61710333acc75af4a990bef"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:38.546207Z","signature_b64":"x+IePTZOSWSlMbvK7Jdd7BxR5jgWJTPOQ4C2QjlF41OZ4OEK9xAmIh1WVtjwwA9/A3maE/6LzT1xA/8WPgWCAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e72871d78014a263aaa32ab4df41255558ab996671cc4ec908f7bc8e2d0b12e5","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:38.545517Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:38.545517Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Which groups are amenable to proving exponent two for matrix multiplication?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DS","math.CO"],"primary_cat":"math.GR","authors_text":"Chris Umans, Henry Cohn, Jonah Blasiak, Joshua A. Grochow, Thomas Church","submitted_at":"2017-12-06T17:38:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Cohn-Umans group-theoretic approach to matrix multiplication suggests embedding matrix multiplication into group algebra multiplication, and bounding $\\omega$ in terms of the representation theory of the host group. This framework is general enough to capture the best known upper bounds on $\\omega$ and is conjectured to be powerful enough to prove $\\omega = 2$, although finding a suitable group and constructing such an embedding has remained elusive. Recently it was shown, by a generalization of the proof of the Cap Set Conjecture, that abelian groups of bounded exponent cannot prove $\\ome"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1712.02302","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1712.02302","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:38.545613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1712.02302v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:38.545613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1712.02302","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:38.545613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"44UHDV4ACSRG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"44UHDV4ACSRGHKVD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"44UHDV4A","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05621","citing_title":"An Improved Construction of Variety-Evasive Subspace Families","ref_index":193,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/44UHDV4A"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/44UHDV4A","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1712.02302&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/44UHDV4ACSRGHKVDFK2N6QJFKV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:38.545613+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:28:38.545613+00:00"}