{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM","short_pith_number":"pith:46ZGOA2U","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e7b26703547337479912a2f642f6d0030bf63953a3b297ee4fb746d27795003b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2007.12667","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Positivity Bounds and the Massless Spin-2 Pole","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Andrew J. Tolley, Claudia de Rham, Lasma Alberte, Sumer Jaitly","submitted_at":"2020-07-24T17:33:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"The presence of a massless spin-2 field in an effective field theory results in a $t$-channel pole in the scattering amplitudes that precludes the application of standard positivity bounds. Despite this, recent arguments based on compactification to three dimensions have suggested that positivity bounds may be applied to the $t$-channel pole subtracted amplitude. If correct this would have deep implications for UV physics and the Weak Gravity Conjecture. Within the context of a simple renormalizable field theory coupled to gravity we find that applying these arguments would constrain the low-e"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2007.12667","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2020-07-24T17:33:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"58829bacb05fca41cdd657f86902fbc92b0999995d49b09476c84d32c0b82b9f","abstract_canon_sha256":"652d20984e32b1abf623a8b3cec16f03cee79d108ca4631b2994dc9ca2aca60a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617582Z","signature_b64":"0Rb2gtZooCkIuKAsOD4gcHdHk/eKwJjl9sCDJ4jzqJskKVFJU8t79mwewoC4UJevNoeoEHa4R2AipZ2t9lyWAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e7b26703547337479912a2f642f6d0030bf63953a3b297ee4fb746d27795003b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617119Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617119Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Positivity Bounds and the Massless Spin-2 Pole","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Andrew J. Tolley, Claudia de Rham, Lasma Alberte, Sumer Jaitly","submitted_at":"2020-07-24T17:33:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"The presence of a massless spin-2 field in an effective field theory results in a $t$-channel pole in the scattering amplitudes that precludes the application of standard positivity bounds. Despite this, recent arguments based on compactification to three dimensions have suggested that positivity bounds may be applied to the $t$-channel pole subtracted amplitude. If correct this would have deep implications for UV physics and the Weak Gravity Conjecture. Within the context of a simple renormalizable field theory coupled to gravity we find that applying these arguments would constrain the low-e"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2007.12667","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2007.12667/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2007.12667","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2007.12667v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.12667","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"46ZGOA2UOM3U","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"46ZGOA2UOM3UPGIS","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"46ZGOA2U","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617182+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06658","citing_title":"The Positivity Geometry of Photon--Dark-Photon Effective Field Theories","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19283","citing_title":"A Dispersive Bootstrap for the Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.15755","citing_title":"Negative running of gravitational positivity","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.00107","citing_title":"Full positivity bounds for anomalous quartic gauge couplings in SMEFT","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15235","citing_title":"Sampling the Graviton Pole and Deprojecting the Swampland","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/46ZGOA2U"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/46ZGOA2U","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2007.12667&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/46ZGOA2UOM3UPGISUL3EF5WQAM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617182+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:03:37.617182+00:00"}