{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK","short_pith_number":"pith:47GKIL24","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e7cca42f5cd189915b5abb8e23f4e04abc95c7741af1d8ec063bcf8671aec541","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2309.05936","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do PLMs Know and Understand Ontological Knowledge?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chengyue Jiang, Kewei Tu, Pengjun Xie, Weiqi Wu, Yong Jiang","submitted_at":"2023-09-12T03:20:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Ontological knowledge, which comprises classes and properties and their relationships, is integral to world knowledge. It is significant to explore whether Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) know and understand such knowledge. However, existing PLM-probing studies focus mainly on factual knowledge, lacking a systematic probing of ontological knowledge. In this paper, we focus on probing whether PLMs store ontological knowledge and have a semantic understanding of the knowledge rather than rote memorization of the surface form. To probe whether PLMs know ontological knowledge, we investigate how"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2309.05936","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-09-12T03:20:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4652a1acbad240c744e1bc5409734c7ed8110c17a921fcc529a9b4f03c98740a","abstract_canon_sha256":"05928dfd62ff5413549127ed336ba7323349d92be88122dfff56708d9c6e86b9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.032347Z","signature_b64":"TwKWUg0SISOonw2qRrHcmvaUdRmuyuoaIRLxJ6piOPA6Cl4dx8uZ03wyHDMIk4FDglMWno2arm77hQ0jpj6eDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e7cca42f5cd189915b5abb8e23f4e04abc95c7741af1d8ec063bcf8671aec541","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031921Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031921Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do PLMs Know and Understand Ontological Knowledge?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chengyue Jiang, Kewei Tu, Pengjun Xie, Weiqi Wu, Yong Jiang","submitted_at":"2023-09-12T03:20:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Ontological knowledge, which comprises classes and properties and their relationships, is integral to world knowledge. It is significant to explore whether Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) know and understand such knowledge. However, existing PLM-probing studies focus mainly on factual knowledge, lacking a systematic probing of ontological knowledge. In this paper, we focus on probing whether PLMs store ontological knowledge and have a semantic understanding of the knowledge rather than rote memorization of the surface form. To probe whether PLMs know ontological knowledge, we investigate how"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2309.05936","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2309.05936/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2309.05936","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031980+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2309.05936v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031980+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.05936","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031980+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"47GKIL242GEZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031980+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"47GKIL242GEZCW22","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031980+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"47GKIL24","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031980+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.06086","citing_title":"Is a Peeled Apple Still Red? Evaluating LLMs' Ability for Conceptual Combination with Property Type","ref_index":2024,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/47GKIL24"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/47GKIL24","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2309.05936&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/47GKIL242GEZCW22XOHCH5HAJK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031980+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:49:49.031980+00:00"}