{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX","short_pith_number":"pith:4AME6UQQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e0184f5210ea10834bafc8d1e9d40285c4bd245e2aec4450b88426373be6b114","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.03296","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Systematic Comparison between Extractive Self-Explanations and Human Rationales in Text Classification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Oliver Eberle, Stephanie Brandl","submitted_at":"2024-10-04T10:14:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Instruction-tuned LLMs are able to provide \\textit{an} explanation about their output to users by generating self-explanations, without requiring the application of complex interpretability techniques. In this paper, we analyse whether this ability results in a \\textit{good} explanation. We evaluate self-explanations in the form of input rationales with respect to their plausibility to humans. We study three text classification tasks: sentiment classification, forced labour detection and claim verification. We include Danish and Italian translations of the sentiment classification task and com"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.03296","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-10-04T10:14:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"76f7622b2e33b1975937204387247ef170b95da483988b969e33fa6aa9f7471f","abstract_canon_sha256":"e5aeb7bf19b60c862fcd5b5060d7c474a179f90f67eee0856be8b87fd433bf59"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366900Z","signature_b64":"1+p2QB1Z64bBm6WkogAumYdH2kv4bwQyO8klwSpekJri2NJo+FGb0Rohjv4aJkhD9daRY3WQjS2JLa/CfRniCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e0184f5210ea10834bafc8d1e9d40285c4bd245e2aec4450b88426373be6b114","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.365946Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.365946Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Systematic Comparison between Extractive Self-Explanations and Human Rationales in Text Classification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Oliver Eberle, Stephanie Brandl","submitted_at":"2024-10-04T10:14:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Instruction-tuned LLMs are able to provide \\textit{an} explanation about their output to users by generating self-explanations, without requiring the application of complex interpretability techniques. In this paper, we analyse whether this ability results in a \\textit{good} explanation. We evaluate self-explanations in the form of input rationales with respect to their plausibility to humans. We study three text classification tasks: sentiment classification, forced labour detection and claim verification. We include Danish and Italian translations of the sentiment classification task and com"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.03296","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.03296/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.03296","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.03296v4","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.03296","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4AME6UQQ5III","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5P","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4AME6UQQ","created_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366077+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4AME6UQQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4AME6UQQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.03296&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4AME6UQQ5IIIGS5PZDI6TVACQX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366077+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T01:05:03.366077+00:00"}