{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB","short_pith_number":"pith:4BKDBXAQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e05430dc108cf515539e50fb0811a1b04c961514d4e1de26f8bacbd006e19270","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.05992","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Psycholinguistic Analyses in Software Engineering Text: A Systematic Literature Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Amirali Sajadi, Kostadin Damevski, Preetha Chatterjee","submitted_at":"2025-03-08T00:23:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context: A deeper understanding of human factors in software engineering (SE) is essential for improving team collaboration, decision-making, and productivity. Communication channels like code reviews and chats provide insights into developers' psychological and emotional states. While large language models excel at text analysis, they often lack transparency and precision. Psycholinguistic tools like Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) offer clearer, interpretable insights into cognitive and emotional processes exhibited in text. Despite its wide use in SE research, no comprehensive revi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.05992","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-03-08T00:23:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"6d8a65544f6500a3280021220a6c76d636bf4238aba7b6d1af12297544c543d0","abstract_canon_sha256":"081cca1dc4eec6ecea23dd454f7cf327d94a51ad25ee09008f1b6032506b2dcb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671676Z","signature_b64":"OTn9vUvMXAYbJiAkju99m8119M4C1oA0d1sDuPoLnASv8kJpqETYLqH1JQxh31NH+byjkJWtj0UOioIRPQRwBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e05430dc108cf515539e50fb0811a1b04c961514d4e1de26f8bacbd006e19270","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671099Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671099Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Psycholinguistic Analyses in Software Engineering Text: A Systematic Literature Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Amirali Sajadi, Kostadin Damevski, Preetha Chatterjee","submitted_at":"2025-03-08T00:23:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context: A deeper understanding of human factors in software engineering (SE) is essential for improving team collaboration, decision-making, and productivity. Communication channels like code reviews and chats provide insights into developers' psychological and emotional states. While large language models excel at text analysis, they often lack transparency and precision. Psycholinguistic tools like Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) offer clearer, interpretable insights into cognitive and emotional processes exhibited in text. Despite its wide use in SE research, no comprehensive revi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.05992","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.05992/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.05992","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.05992v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.05992","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4BKDBXAQRT2R","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671156+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4BKDBXAQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671156+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16756","citing_title":"Mitigating Prompt-Induced Cognitive Biases in General-Purpose AI for Software Engineering","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4BKDBXAQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4BKDBXAQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.05992&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4BKDBXAQRT2RKU46KD5QQENBWB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671156+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:47.671156+00:00"}