{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY","short_pith_number":"pith:4CRCHVL3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e0a223d57ba30dc72663cb77760cbe0e1a5b38dc7bfe7463df598ce4a569143e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2312.09454","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.HC","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"eess.SP","authors_text":"Andreea Ioana Sburlea, Ivo Pascal de Jong, Matias Valdenegro-Toro","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T14:24:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) has gained traction in an attempt to improve the interpretability and robustness of machine learning predictions. Specifically (medical) biosignals such as electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), electrooculography (EOG), and electromyography (EMG) could benefit from good UQ, since these suffer from a poor signal-to-noise ratio, and good human interpretability is pivotal for medical applications. In this paper, we review the state of the art of applying Uncertainty Quantification to Machine Learning tasks in the biosignal domain. We present vari"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2312.09454","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"eess.SP","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T14:24:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.HC","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"d178f05e72ab64cc477bc3f6529050405a59464fefd2e44c60ae6628f85ad16c","abstract_canon_sha256":"0e68f5abfeb275073175a1c0540b39a8e9346c0154ba5b69b14e441488a78e83"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.342076Z","signature_b64":"AvbTWVJoy1gy+T1Dqj3yQ/q1icG0oeiHTYq4sIoKy+izB6/522wmHQTNs9ePTsyo59MMUJXXg1ssA4WkF+jMAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e0a223d57ba30dc72663cb77760cbe0e1a5b38dc7bfe7463df598ce4a569143e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341436Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341436Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.HC","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"eess.SP","authors_text":"Andreea Ioana Sburlea, Ivo Pascal de Jong, Matias Valdenegro-Toro","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T14:24:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) has gained traction in an attempt to improve the interpretability and robustness of machine learning predictions. Specifically (medical) biosignals such as electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), electrooculography (EOG), and electromyography (EMG) could benefit from good UQ, since these suffer from a poor signal-to-noise ratio, and good human interpretability is pivotal for medical applications. In this paper, we review the state of the art of applying Uncertainty Quantification to Machine Learning tasks in the biosignal domain. We present vari"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2312.09454","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2312.09454/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2312.09454","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2312.09454v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2312.09454","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4CRCHVL3UMG4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTD","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4CRCHVL3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341525+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30741","citing_title":"Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4CRCHVL3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4CRCHVL3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2312.09454&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4CRCHVL3UMG4OJTDZN3XMDF6BY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341525+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:01.341525+00:00"}