{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ","short_pith_number":"pith:4D5YC7WI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e0fb817ec8bcf6a1f27285355c60f222717938486dd7c8dcb179ec64a8dda51a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.01259","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do Concept Bottleneck Models Respect Localities?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Juyeon Heo, Mateja Jamnik, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Naveen Raman","submitted_at":"2024-01-02T16:05:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Concept-based explainability methods use human-understandable intermediaries to produce explanations for machine learning models. These methods assume concept predictions can help understand a model's internal reasoning. In this work, we assess the degree to which such an assumption is true by analyzing whether concept predictors leverage \"relevant\" features to make predictions, a term we call locality. Concept-based models that fail to respect localities also fail to be explainable because concept predictions are based on spurious features, making the interpretation of the concept predictions"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.01259","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-01-02T16:05:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"a77a4c00bc13a72e816e87094b71d61050208fa70cf526477c7c8f21a21131c1","abstract_canon_sha256":"e7cb48c833b3f4beb4ded13467cea5cee8c4e2b7bce2d6a1c324ac9a81b96fa2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.355060Z","signature_b64":"GZ9Ip7d6bXuE2Gtl2gOnOALqzxkcOfEXWItLPwAwcVQTEl5AHNgctDQPq1A1yToRYWsPTLn/H+pndXEk/fu2AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e0fb817ec8bcf6a1f27285355c60f222717938486dd7c8dcb179ec64a8dda51a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354563Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354563Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do Concept Bottleneck Models Respect Localities?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Juyeon Heo, Mateja Jamnik, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Naveen Raman","submitted_at":"2024-01-02T16:05:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Concept-based explainability methods use human-understandable intermediaries to produce explanations for machine learning models. These methods assume concept predictions can help understand a model's internal reasoning. In this work, we assess the degree to which such an assumption is true by analyzing whether concept predictors leverage \"relevant\" features to make predictions, a term we call locality. Concept-based models that fail to respect localities also fail to be explainable because concept predictions are based on spurious features, making the interpretation of the concept predictions"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.01259","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.01259/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.01259","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.01259v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.01259","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4D5YC7WIXT3K","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TS","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4D5YC7WI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354623+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04326","citing_title":"Measuring What Matters: Synthetic Benchmarks for Concept Bottleneck Models","ref_index":69,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4D5YC7WI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4D5YC7WI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.01259&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4D5YC7WIXT3KD4TSQU2VYYHSEJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354623+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:13.354623+00:00"}