{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2006:4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF","short_pith_number":"pith:4E5IPK7U","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e13a87abf405b240da45c443f47ddd894ea72b091b6b06b04d01c802617ad2d6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"quant-ph/0612127","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Violation of monogamy inequality for higher-dimensional objects","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Yong-Cheng Ou","submitted_at":"2006-12-15T04:19:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bipartite quantum entanglement for qutrits and higher-dimensional objects is considered. We analyze the possibility of violation of monogamy inequality, introduced by Coffman, Kundu, and Wootters, for some systems composed of such objects. An explicit counterexample with a three-qutrit totally antisymmetric state is presented. Since three-tangle has been confirmed to be a natural measure of entanglement for qubit systems, our result shows that the three-tangle is no longer a legitimate measure of entanglement for states with three qutrits or higher dimensional objects."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0612127","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2006-12-15T04:19:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3cd7b23e0880d0dd00bd2f2c50f0361710d0dc9768fc6445fb0de9a2689d08b1","abstract_canon_sha256":"e22fdeed6c8803a92bc9414672fa784c39701623194fbe9c87f6f90e1bc47b1a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:53.699773Z","signature_b64":"Pm7DtRO8A+ye9EpMq8GZjBKGYtnSiAeJh+zLc+wyqUbaGolBzL+M5PkWMD8pBWsdZbAD6iMRECYo3YES8tHrCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e13a87abf405b240da45c443f47ddd894ea72b091b6b06b04d01c802617ad2d6","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:53.699259Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:53.699259Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Violation of monogamy inequality for higher-dimensional objects","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Yong-Cheng Ou","submitted_at":"2006-12-15T04:19:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bipartite quantum entanglement for qutrits and higher-dimensional objects is considered. We analyze the possibility of violation of monogamy inequality, introduced by Coffman, Kundu, and Wootters, for some systems composed of such objects. An explicit counterexample with a three-qutrit totally antisymmetric state is presented. Since three-tangle has been confirmed to be a natural measure of entanglement for qubit systems, our result shows that the three-tangle is no longer a legitimate measure of entanglement for states with three qutrits or higher dimensional objects."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0612127","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"quant-ph/0612127","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:53.699325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"quant-ph/0612127v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:53.699325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0612127","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:53.699325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4E5IPK7UAWZE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:53.939244+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:53.939244+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4E5IPK7U","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:53.939244+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1906.10929","citing_title":"Entanglement Certification $-$ From Theory to Experiment","ref_index":235,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4E5IPK7U"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4E5IPK7U","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=quant-ph/0612127&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4E5IPK7UAWZEBWSFYRB7I7O5RF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:53.699325+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:37:53.699325+00:00"}