{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY","short_pith_number":"pith:4EYNAEYI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e130d0130816dfa3e462508f62be77863239dd22d453392014dc3e3b0bdceb07","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.03552","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can Cross Encoders Produce Useful Sentence Embeddings?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Haritha Ananthakrishnan, Harsha Kokel, Horst Samulowitz, Julian Dolby, Kavitha Srinivas","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T19:09:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Cross encoders (CEs) are trained with sentence pairs to detect relatedness. As CEs require sentence pairs at inference, the prevailing view is that they can only be used as re-rankers in information retrieval pipelines. Dual encoders (DEs) are instead used to embed sentences, where sentence pairs are encoded by two separate encoders with shared weights at training, and a loss function that ensures the pair's embeddings lie close in vector space if the sentences are related. DEs however, require much larger datasets to train, and are less accurate than CEs. We report a curious finding that embe"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.03552","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T19:09:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.IR"],"title_canon_sha256":"69306f98cc3c994f5b4cc2d59bc3f3700d5bc87537705c133a43c440a6cc479e","abstract_canon_sha256":"fb1e681413e5aef74c5a277ae23f573c68085d6b3b2c98cb1b3d01c41f738d47"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.971234Z","signature_b64":"+YvdoRpdblTy9dPK58RK31d5yembM+Tyy+BOhVKLpJpqEqDHW557XHMxiQdSu9cyLQv6MwG+CqNIHlYe5cGeDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e130d0130816dfa3e462508f62be77863239dd22d453392014dc3e3b0bdceb07","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970748Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970748Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can Cross Encoders Produce Useful Sentence Embeddings?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Haritha Ananthakrishnan, Harsha Kokel, Horst Samulowitz, Julian Dolby, Kavitha Srinivas","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T19:09:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Cross encoders (CEs) are trained with sentence pairs to detect relatedness. As CEs require sentence pairs at inference, the prevailing view is that they can only be used as re-rankers in information retrieval pipelines. Dual encoders (DEs) are instead used to embed sentences, where sentence pairs are encoded by two separate encoders with shared weights at training, and a loss function that ensures the pair's embeddings lie close in vector space if the sentences are related. DEs however, require much larger datasets to train, and are less accurate than CEs. We report a curious finding that embe"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.03552","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.03552/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.03552","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.03552v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.03552","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4EYNAEYIC3P2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDC","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4EYNAEYI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970809+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4EYNAEYI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4EYNAEYI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.03552&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4EYNAEYIC3P2HZDCKCHWFPTXQY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970809+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:11.970809+00:00"}