{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL","short_pith_number":"pith:4H47JVJ2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e1f9f4d53a5b584fe2f60fff8a7280c2e8b6c47738d9be7e9236ff1bfed36db9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2007.01296","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Putting SMEFT Fits to Work","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Sally Dawson, Samuel D. Lane, Samuel Homiller","submitted_at":"2020-07-02T17:59:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) provides a consistent framework for comparing precision measurements at the LHC to the Standard Model. The observation of statistically significant non-zero SMEFT coefficients would correspond to physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) of some sort. A more difficult question to answer is what, if any, detailed information about the nature of the underlying high scale model can be obtained from these measurements. In this work, we consider the patterns of SMEFT operators present in five example models and discuss the assumptions inherent in usin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2007.01296","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-07-02T17:59:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"02e124ea6d9001b05f87fdc2d0ede02051698be44926b24911c45e1a99d1dce4","abstract_canon_sha256":"c43e0f026726602ecf9cb28e29584e780e9fcff3758d96df1e35f557b9affa29"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432428Z","signature_b64":"OVrn6MXwZ6J5Wv7l+M96OrNR+YRaZuFpm7cBKg/AG50V6OQznyC+51XvnRtmiM/Xens9bp/TxGCMxTZkrLnYAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e1f9f4d53a5b584fe2f60fff8a7280c2e8b6c47738d9be7e9236ff1bfed36db9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432020Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432020Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Putting SMEFT Fits to Work","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Sally Dawson, Samuel D. Lane, Samuel Homiller","submitted_at":"2020-07-02T17:59:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) provides a consistent framework for comparing precision measurements at the LHC to the Standard Model. The observation of statistically significant non-zero SMEFT coefficients would correspond to physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) of some sort. A more difficult question to answer is what, if any, detailed information about the nature of the underlying high scale model can be obtained from these measurements. In this work, we consider the patterns of SMEFT operators present in five example models and discuss the assumptions inherent in usin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2007.01296","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2007.01296/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2007.01296","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2007.01296v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.01296","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4H47JVJ2LNME","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4H47JVJ2LNME7YXW","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4H47JVJ2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432077+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19202","citing_title":"Renormalization of the SMEFT to Dimension Eight: Fermionic Interactions II","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15262","citing_title":"USMEFT as a tool for discovery of universal new physics at high luminosity LHC","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21670","citing_title":"Effective field theory interpretation of ATLAS measurements involving the Higgs boson, electroweak bosons and the top quark","ref_index":114,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4H47JVJ2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4H47JVJ2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2007.01296&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4H47JVJ2LNME7YXWB77YU4UAYL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432077+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:34:40.432077+00:00"}