{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM","short_pith_number":"pith:4HVRGIP4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e1eb1321fcc1dd447e83fa877a72f2533c87c73a780d8cb9aa92d3e093ec74d0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2109.00923","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT","cs.LG","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"econ.GN","authors_text":"Jamie Morgenstern, Siddarth Srinivasan","submitted_at":"2021-08-27T23:47:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Peer reviewed publications are considered the gold standard in certifying and disseminating ideas that a research community considers valuable. However, we identify two major drawbacks of the current system: (1) the overwhelming demand for reviewers due to a large volume of submissions, and (2) the lack of incentives for reviewers to participate and expend the necessary effort to provide high-quality reviews. In this work, we adopt a mechanism-design approach to propose improvements to the peer review process, tying together the paper submission and review processes and simultaneously incentiv"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2109.00923","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.GN","submitted_at":"2021-08-27T23:47:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.GT","cs.LG","q-fin.EC"],"title_canon_sha256":"f58fae54042c9272756c067e4f15810c9f7cbd0555ea07eeacdaf4a3a193ee1a","abstract_canon_sha256":"81a2003849e4626b97a1f4c09cf9459075809b2e0b6d1f5b4e87a9bc10921c8e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523710Z","signature_b64":"BgpqdrfXruHmm2j/L4ze2/7UhBGXtl1aOBb8RbEHiWsHKUj2Ec52afDXVmRb3OFFznEbPER4Ig8nsP1qw6pLBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e1eb1321fcc1dd447e83fa877a72f2533c87c73a780d8cb9aa92d3e093ec74d0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523262Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523262Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT","cs.LG","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"econ.GN","authors_text":"Jamie Morgenstern, Siddarth Srinivasan","submitted_at":"2021-08-27T23:47:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Peer reviewed publications are considered the gold standard in certifying and disseminating ideas that a research community considers valuable. However, we identify two major drawbacks of the current system: (1) the overwhelming demand for reviewers due to a large volume of submissions, and (2) the lack of incentives for reviewers to participate and expend the necessary effort to provide high-quality reviews. In this work, we adopt a mechanism-design approach to propose improvements to the peer review process, tying together the paper submission and review processes and simultaneously incentiv"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2109.00923","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2109.00923/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2109.00923","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523322+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2109.00923v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523322+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2109.00923","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523322+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4HVRGIP4YHOU","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523322+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523322+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4HVRGIP4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523322+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07434","citing_title":"Evidence Markets","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.24165","citing_title":"PeerBTS: Incentivizing Effort in Strategyproof Peer Selection","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4HVRGIP4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4HVRGIP4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2109.00923&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4HVRGIP4YHOUI7UD7KDXU4XSKM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523322+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:09:03.523322+00:00"}