{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO","short_pith_number":"pith:4IVR4FHN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e22b1e14ed86d3ae03504691d29050bb8f6ec9aebd6ce4deeb2162a935d1754b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.03292","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Evaluating AI fairness in credit scoring with the BRIO tool","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Davide Posillipo, Enrico Bagli, Francesco A. Genco, Giuseppe Primiero, Greta Coraglia, Pellegrino Piantadosi, Pietro Giuffrida","submitted_at":"2024-06-05T14:00:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a method for quantitative, in-depth analyses of fairness issues in AI systems with an application to credit scoring. To this aim we use BRIO, a tool for the evaluation of AI systems with respect to social unfairness and, more in general, ethically undesirable behaviours. It features a model-agnostic bias detection module, presented in \\cite{DBLP:conf/beware/CoragliaDGGPPQ23}, to which a full-fledged unfairness risk evaluation module is added. As a case study, we focus on the context of credit scoring, analysing the UCI German Credit Dataset \\cite{misc_statlog_(german_credit_data)_14"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.03292","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-06-05T14:00:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3e33c75278da6e1e7b47bc88e5f1febd931f354ce5d6bdd8d5d753f8f2edee98","abstract_canon_sha256":"0e6d5e348ae2e583f000e5deb45f498c6092340eec8859fc7d381d5d5c7e102e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.581372Z","signature_b64":"S9UgpJMwPB4y7tghh8CuGIxJpJgHqlYsJz6e7hY1jnbM3dGKVNHvcaBUojYErTBzMdLOuE2zaH63RzUa85FRBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e22b1e14ed86d3ae03504691d29050bb8f6ec9aebd6ce4deeb2162a935d1754b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580852Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580852Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Evaluating AI fairness in credit scoring with the BRIO tool","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Davide Posillipo, Enrico Bagli, Francesco A. Genco, Giuseppe Primiero, Greta Coraglia, Pellegrino Piantadosi, Pietro Giuffrida","submitted_at":"2024-06-05T14:00:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a method for quantitative, in-depth analyses of fairness issues in AI systems with an application to credit scoring. To this aim we use BRIO, a tool for the evaluation of AI systems with respect to social unfairness and, more in general, ethically undesirable behaviours. It features a model-agnostic bias detection module, presented in \\cite{DBLP:conf/beware/CoragliaDGGPPQ23}, to which a full-fledged unfairness risk evaluation module is added. As a case study, we focus on the context of credit scoring, analysing the UCI German Credit Dataset \\cite{misc_statlog_(german_credit_data)_14"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.03292","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.03292/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.03292","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580917+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.03292v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580917+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.03292","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580917+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4IVR4FHNQ3J2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580917+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2Q","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580917+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4IVR4FHN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580917+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.07754","citing_title":"Comparing Credit Risk Estimates in the Gen-AI Era","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4IVR4FHN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4IVR4FHN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.03292&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4IVR4FHNQ3J24A2QI2I5FECQXO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580917+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.580917+00:00"}