{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5","short_pith_number":"pith:4JDZ3F5Y","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e2479d97b8eb00982d241113f00d0e0f785701bc84ca0965aed9e81b19cf07ed","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2403.16812","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards Human-AI Deliberation: Design and Evaluation of LLM-Empowered Deliberative AI for AI-Assisted Decision-Making","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Chengbo Zheng, Ming Yin, Qiaoyi Chen, Shuai Ma, Xiaojuan Ma, Xinru Wang, Zhenhui Peng","submitted_at":"2024-03-25T14:34:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"In AI-assisted decision-making, humans often passively review AI's suggestion and decide whether to accept or reject it as a whole. In such a paradigm, humans are found to rarely trigger analytical thinking and face difficulties in communicating the nuances of conflicting opinions to the AI when disagreements occur. To tackle this challenge, we propose Human-AI Deliberation, a novel framework to promote human reflection and discussion on conflicting human-AI opinions in decision-making. Based on theories in human deliberation, this framework engages humans and AI in dimension-level opinion eli"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2403.16812","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-03-25T14:34:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"ff74c47f9d0937175524dd087d14d3a43a8552ddc44eca377254e6c6f86923c3","abstract_canon_sha256":"71ed91c31e12da6f2882af532512fa210edb6bcd26e082d56d08e4853a4bc886"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.231123Z","signature_b64":"jD23H6A1H/h1Xgxf8HYGPVInMDacDoaZfGgplRbCYmEEQkR/pYp/FVAbIgBNVCXN6N7gappJqbiOVbyIoLYDCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e2479d97b8eb00982d241113f00d0e0f785701bc84ca0965aed9e81b19cf07ed","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230292Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230292Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards Human-AI Deliberation: Design and Evaluation of LLM-Empowered Deliberative AI for AI-Assisted Decision-Making","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Chengbo Zheng, Ming Yin, Qiaoyi Chen, Shuai Ma, Xiaojuan Ma, Xinru Wang, Zhenhui Peng","submitted_at":"2024-03-25T14:34:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"In AI-assisted decision-making, humans often passively review AI's suggestion and decide whether to accept or reject it as a whole. In such a paradigm, humans are found to rarely trigger analytical thinking and face difficulties in communicating the nuances of conflicting opinions to the AI when disagreements occur. To tackle this challenge, we propose Human-AI Deliberation, a novel framework to promote human reflection and discussion on conflicting human-AI opinions in decision-making. Based on theories in human deliberation, this framework engages humans and AI in dimension-level opinion eli"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2403.16812","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2403.16812/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2403.16812","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2403.16812v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.16812","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4JDZ3F5Y5MAJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJE","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4JDZ3F5Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230416+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2409.18660","citing_title":"Who Benefits from AI? Self-Selection, Skill Gap, and the Hidden Costs of AI Feedback","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4JDZ3F5Y"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4JDZ3F5Y","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2403.16812&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4JDZ3F5Y5MAJQLJECEJ7ADIOB5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230416+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:29:16.230416+00:00"}