{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV","short_pith_number":"pith:4JIDGC37","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e250330b7fc238ba0236476f613988a55134d71d9c60cbd8dcb62c5a9fc576b5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2304.04339","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Study","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Qiming Xie, Rui Xia, Yi Feng, Zengzhi Wang, Zinong Yang, Zixiang Ding","submitted_at":"2023-04-10T00:55:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, ChatGPT has drawn great attention from both the research community and the public. We are particularly interested in whether it can serve as a universal sentiment analyzer. To this end, in this work, we provide a preliminary evaluation of ChatGPT on the understanding of \\emph{opinions}, \\emph{sentiments}, and \\emph{emotions} contained in the text. Specifically, we evaluate it in three settings, including \\emph{standard} evaluation, \\emph{polarity shift} evaluation and \\emph{open-domain} evaluation. We conduct an evaluation on 7 representative sentiment analysis tasks covering 17 benc"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2304.04339","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-04-10T00:55:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"8d79e0999522218f783d525375a7bc4b9965e81cbe9beb2516fa22f7eb41d87f","abstract_canon_sha256":"57c345a1860878e92d93112f8fedc643d42bdf14042105813b0147ff36335808"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.383117Z","signature_b64":"8pJJFm/4cUBtPFxZumxIZIoU22qE6PN7ijbPI5hcnS7kaevG+1RSw7r4smNkuM1aN/tb+sCLQWNk/8nx3irYCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e250330b7fc238ba0236476f613988a55134d71d9c60cbd8dcb62c5a9fc576b5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382663Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382663Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Study","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Qiming Xie, Rui Xia, Yi Feng, Zengzhi Wang, Zinong Yang, Zixiang Ding","submitted_at":"2023-04-10T00:55:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, ChatGPT has drawn great attention from both the research community and the public. We are particularly interested in whether it can serve as a universal sentiment analyzer. To this end, in this work, we provide a preliminary evaluation of ChatGPT on the understanding of \\emph{opinions}, \\emph{sentiments}, and \\emph{emotions} contained in the text. Specifically, we evaluate it in three settings, including \\emph{standard} evaluation, \\emph{polarity shift} evaluation and \\emph{open-domain} evaluation. We conduct an evaluation on 7 representative sentiment analysis tasks covering 17 benc"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2304.04339","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2304.04339/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2304.04339","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2304.04339v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2304.04339","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4JIDGC37YI4L","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4JIDGC37YI4LUARW","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4JIDGC37","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382733+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23701","citing_title":"Evaluating LLM Usage for Efficient and Explainable Numerical and Classified Implicit Sentiment Analysis of Product Desirability","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22542","citing_title":"Scene Abstraction for Lexical Semantics: Structured Representations of Situated Meaning","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2406.04244","citing_title":"Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Survey","ref_index":158,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03724","citing_title":"Rank, Don't Generate: Statement-level Ranking for Explainable Recommendation","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4JIDGC37"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4JIDGC37","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2304.04339&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4JIDGC37YI4LUARWI5XWCOMIUV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382733+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:17.382733+00:00"}