{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS","short_pith_number":"pith:4KBY6UGZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e2838f50d9aebc6eb7fad4e1693d8d849160ca16f898e8c4dd15b185442c7565","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.10802","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"TimeSeriesBench: An Industrial-Grade Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Changhua Pei, Dan Pei, Gaogang Xie, Haiming Zhang, Hang Cui, Haotian Si, Jianhui Li, Jing Han, Jingjing Li, Jingwen Yang, Shenglin Zhang, Yongqian Sun","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T16:25:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) has gained significant attention due to its real-world applications to improve the stability of modern software systems. However, there is no effective way to verify whether they can meet the requirements for real-world deployment. Firstly, current algorithms typically train a specific model for each time series. Maintaining such many models is impractical in a large-scale system with tens of thousands of curves. The performance of using merely one unified model to detect anomalies remains unknown. Secondly, most TSAD models are trained on the historical pa"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.10802","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T16:25:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"9f3b3875a6cc10934f9cfd38a74bd33376c0f86a267b94b67c5b65a3899748e8","abstract_canon_sha256":"4f4f2b8a92cb602968aa3d9cedbfaae924a6744450f655f8c6ef1c3a67d14ac8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.308436Z","signature_b64":"yvqlLhmsQRa7Xsc+8sbJoJDs28AjnQFPJc0GulUJz0DfeSwOfsup8hdqb0urmTlr6NhgMc9VBzgOmqZEHZUGCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e2838f50d9aebc6eb7fad4e1693d8d849160ca16f898e8c4dd15b185442c7565","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307836Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307836Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"TimeSeriesBench: An Industrial-Grade Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Changhua Pei, Dan Pei, Gaogang Xie, Haiming Zhang, Hang Cui, Haotian Si, Jianhui Li, Jing Han, Jingjing Li, Jingwen Yang, Shenglin Zhang, Yongqian Sun","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T16:25:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) has gained significant attention due to its real-world applications to improve the stability of modern software systems. However, there is no effective way to verify whether they can meet the requirements for real-world deployment. Firstly, current algorithms typically train a specific model for each time series. Maintaining such many models is impractical in a large-scale system with tens of thousands of curves. The performance of using merely one unified model to detect anomalies remains unknown. Secondly, most TSAD models are trained on the historical pa"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.10802","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.10802/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.10802","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307909+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.10802v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307909+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.10802","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307909+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4KBY6UGZV26G","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307909+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4KBY6UGZV26G5N72","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307909+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4KBY6UGZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307909+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.14170","citing_title":"Argos: Agentic Time-Series Anomaly Detection with Autonomous Rule Generation via Large Language Models","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4KBY6UGZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4KBY6UGZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.10802&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4KBY6UGZV26G5N722TQWSPMNQS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307909+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:16.307909+00:00"}