{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK","short_pith_number":"pith:4LBV4CHK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e2c35e08eac524783e869623077eef02825301feb6ca0039125c233c8f5ce33a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.02999","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Efficient reanalysis of events from GWTC-3 with RIFT and asimov","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"D. Fernando, D. Williams, R. O'Shaughnessy","submitted_at":"2024-12-04T03:35:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Different waveform models can yield notably different conclusions about the properties of individual gravitational wave events. For instance, previous analyses using the SEOBNRv4PHM, IMRPhenomXPHM models, and NRSur7dq4 have led to varying results regarding event properties. This variability complicates the interpretation of the data and understanding of the astrophysical phenomena involved. There is an ongoing need to reassess candidate events with the best available interpretations and models. Current approaches lack efficiency or consistency, making it challenging to perform large-scale rean"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.02999","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2024-12-04T03:35:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"9960b88508c130a81130d1c58482945d47166c47e33dad438f5fb10d4539bc40","abstract_canon_sha256":"cfd88c60ef72bb9eb6737197639148094f2402786151d3a6f21c2c37ba8f242e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339716Z","signature_b64":"/fxr3o6VCS4t+Ed0HaJhitGSOODLZ0Tk95F96mflubyKi/V+NIHnDCeAykLGPU1LaEecSLBFbcGMg1uBNkxPBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e2c35e08eac524783e869623077eef02825301feb6ca0039125c233c8f5ce33a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339158Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339158Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Efficient reanalysis of events from GWTC-3 with RIFT and asimov","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","authors_text":"D. Fernando, D. Williams, R. O'Shaughnessy","submitted_at":"2024-12-04T03:35:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Different waveform models can yield notably different conclusions about the properties of individual gravitational wave events. For instance, previous analyses using the SEOBNRv4PHM, IMRPhenomXPHM models, and NRSur7dq4 have led to varying results regarding event properties. This variability complicates the interpretation of the data and understanding of the astrophysical phenomena involved. There is an ongoing need to reassess candidate events with the best available interpretations and models. Current approaches lack efficiency or consistency, making it challenging to perform large-scale rean"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.02999","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.02999/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.02999","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.02999v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.02999","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4LBV4CHKYUSH","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUG","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4LBV4CHK","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339216+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12818","citing_title":"Assessing the imprint of eccentricity in GW signatures using two independent waveform models","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4LBV4CHK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4LBV4CHK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.02999&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4LBV4CHKYUSHQPUGSYRQO7XPAK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339216+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:44:23.339216+00:00"}