{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD","short_pith_number":"pith:4LWXLTNF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e2ed75cda5b7c4d3f16304fb4af98c08cd64d152a3e731b805e53bef32b57d92","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.06055","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Are we chasing ghosts? Quantifying unattributable polarization, and attributing the rest to annotator groups","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dimitris Tsirmpas, John Pavlopoulos","submitted_at":"2026-01-16T12:32:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Standard agreement metrics often fail to capture systematic differences in opinion between minority and majority-group annotators, jeopardizing tasks such as hate speech and toxicity detection. Polarization has recently been proposed as a more robust way of distinguishing minor disagreements from systematic differences in opinion, but existing approaches do not provide practical tools for attributing it to specific annotator groups. We evaluate current methods and identify two major limitations in realistic settings: (1) the presence of ``inherent'' polarization that cannot be attributed to an"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.06055","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-01-16T12:32:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3da8d378ddf91ebb33f244792721382643cd2df271e8528e358f849668f3ee92","abstract_canon_sha256":"a74ddaf4342ed00c66976b4979e4cdf6ee75f72e9e882189abffbf920b9af8ab"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.087550Z","signature_b64":"JfY6MOWqpeWxhFwMnLEx4zNFkgBIcIY12McF3IF91E3QD9m8W2cAKGMJEPla1SqYeZr7aawyWPu5m9Kxe0BDAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e2ed75cda5b7c4d3f16304fb4af98c08cd64d152a3e731b805e53bef32b57d92","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086513Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086513Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Are we chasing ghosts? Quantifying unattributable polarization, and attributing the rest to annotator groups","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dimitris Tsirmpas, John Pavlopoulos","submitted_at":"2026-01-16T12:32:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Standard agreement metrics often fail to capture systematic differences in opinion between minority and majority-group annotators, jeopardizing tasks such as hate speech and toxicity detection. Polarization has recently been proposed as a more robust way of distinguishing minor disagreements from systematic differences in opinion, but existing approaches do not provide practical tools for attributing it to specific annotator groups. We evaluate current methods and identify two major limitations in realistic settings: (1) the presence of ``inherent'' polarization that cannot be attributed to an"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.06055","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.06055/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.06055","created_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086704+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.06055v2","created_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086704+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.06055","created_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086704+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4LWXLTNFW7CN","created_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086704+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LD","created_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086704+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4LWXLTNF","created_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086704+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4LWXLTNF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4LWXLTNF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.06055&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4LWXLTNFW7CNH4LDAT5UV6MMBD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086704+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-01T01:03:50.086704+00:00"}