{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4","short_pith_number":"pith:4LYC5D2A","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e2f02e8f40b032f0379eec57d2ccc3072f14fbd58a94513b3d03a208a2d1d3ba","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.12207","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Estimating treatment effects with a unified semi-parametric difference-in-differences approach","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Andrew J. Spieker, Bryan E. Shepherd, Chun Li, Julia C. Thome, Peter F. Rebeiro, Tong Li","submitted_at":"2025-06-13T20:24:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches are widely used for estimating causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated after making a parallel trends assumption on the means of the outcome. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed; however, the transformation may be difficult to choose, results may be sensitive to the choice, and parallel trends assumptions are made on the transformed scale. Recent DID methods estimate alternative treatment effects that may be preferable with sk"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.12207","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2025-06-13T20:24:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"339d23613d7a6990890768e873addd7516ee7f06f90dc4bf46b8916955460d1c","abstract_canon_sha256":"efa4b102ef7a1261d5c85bb7ae757c08e6dd0f184ae7c7c7da4b7cce291f7781"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.602204Z","signature_b64":"XhvOI99+yfyEoKu+s059eLU3sYtTldxZDRoVEhQiOctFk8QD1lc6W7ouGh+U8bSExx/gwMpbsvE+BGXJPwWeAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e2f02e8f40b032f0379eec57d2ccc3072f14fbd58a94513b3d03a208a2d1d3ba","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601700Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601700Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Estimating treatment effects with a unified semi-parametric difference-in-differences approach","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Andrew J. Spieker, Bryan E. Shepherd, Chun Li, Julia C. Thome, Peter F. Rebeiro, Tong Li","submitted_at":"2025-06-13T20:24:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches are widely used for estimating causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated after making a parallel trends assumption on the means of the outcome. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed; however, the transformation may be difficult to choose, results may be sensitive to the choice, and parallel trends assumptions are made on the transformed scale. Recent DID methods estimate alternative treatment effects that may be preferable with sk"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.12207","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.12207/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.12207","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.12207v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.12207","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4LYC5D2AWAZP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4LYC5D2AWAZPAN46","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4LYC5D2A","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601767+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.07228","citing_title":"On a Debiased and Semiparametric Efficient Changes-in-Changes Estimator","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4LYC5D2A"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4LYC5D2A","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.12207&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4LYC5D2AWAZPAN465RL5FTGDA4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601767+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:12.601767+00:00"}