{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34","short_pith_number":"pith:4M4RNE7Q","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e3391693f016aa98232aa8b4273816df20b34991c2f8c63c630cc84baa6b0a55","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.00874","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"P2NIA: Privacy-Preserving Non-Iterative Auditing","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Beno\\^it Rottembourg, Erwan Le Merrer, Gilles Tredan, Hadrien Lautraite, Jade Garcia Bourr\\'ee, S\\'ebastien Gambs","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T15:04:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The emergence of AI legislation has increased the need to assess the ethical compliance of high-risk AI systems. Traditional auditing methods rely on platforms' application programming interfaces (APIs), where responses to queries are examined through the lens of fairness requirements. However, such approaches put a significant burden on platforms, as they are forced to maintain APIs while ensuring privacy, facing the possibility of data leaks. This lack of proper collaboration between the two parties, in turn, causes a significant challenge to the auditor, who is subject to estimation bias as"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.00874","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T15:04:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"5fc5d6363cdaf260db5560af15e5dd21926cb9626029b01f78ee57dd4b9d3025","abstract_canon_sha256":"c76fcc8d3f723fcdd3b0ef1264b88d075b77ddd4f0efd72335a8f7a75299f54d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370357Z","signature_b64":"Xjus3QeSyFkwxyNZUx6/jAM8fiqYJR//HoEYM0Ljk4eD0jNoc9vbZAmHvo6nTQphzQO1LuZJB7e6r8U2B6YLCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e3391693f016aa98232aa8b4273816df20b34991c2f8c63c630cc84baa6b0a55","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.369954Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.369954Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"P2NIA: Privacy-Preserving Non-Iterative Auditing","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Beno\\^it Rottembourg, Erwan Le Merrer, Gilles Tredan, Hadrien Lautraite, Jade Garcia Bourr\\'ee, S\\'ebastien Gambs","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T15:04:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The emergence of AI legislation has increased the need to assess the ethical compliance of high-risk AI systems. Traditional auditing methods rely on platforms' application programming interfaces (APIs), where responses to queries are examined through the lens of fairness requirements. However, such approaches put a significant burden on platforms, as they are forced to maintain APIs while ensuring privacy, facing the possibility of data leaks. This lack of proper collaboration between the two parties, in turn, causes a significant challenge to the auditor, who is subject to estimation bias as"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.00874","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.00874/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.00874","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370010+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.00874v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370010+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.00874","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370010+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4M4RNE7QC2VJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370010+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZK","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370010+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4M4RNE7Q","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370010+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.21839","citing_title":"Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4M4RNE7Q"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4M4RNE7Q","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.00874&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4M4RNE7QC2VJQIZKVC2COOAW34/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370010+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:42:52.370010+00:00"}