{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU","short_pith_number":"pith:4MYVD43P","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e33151f36ffb60b89df8211d5ee7bf4d1fa71db96179a4f3c29066248db0de71","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.17808","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"That Dot on the Screen: also, what about Born? and other objections to wavefunction physics","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.gen-ph","authors_text":"W. David Wick","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T17:13:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper I address the most common objections to the claim that Schrodinger was right in 1926: the wavefunction provides the correct, and complete, description of atomic phenomena. I suggest that the line of droplets in the Wilson cloud chamber, the click of the ``photon detector\", and ``that dot on the screen\" can all be explained within a context of wavefunction models and Schrodinger's-type equations, albeit nonlinear. No auxiliary hypotheses about point particles or probabilities are required. The random locations of the triggered ``particle detectors\" can be explained by ``chaos\" (me"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.17808","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.gen-ph","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T17:13:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"15db1e3d2cb5198a065bae18bdb46c6226e838eafa2781f68e02cdc1d1496fc9","abstract_canon_sha256":"bcf342b7f588704261857dd1a83a744b3ad2f093b0e58ed5cd4ea58b5b2f793c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.329223Z","signature_b64":"HV955vuUjb+TO1qw75SoGclYFtVs5cOLJIHDeX1pR0UCDoIGHKRNgEyxNulkUIv6LtGR2iNVtyZsWqk4G7hVBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e33151f36ffb60b89df8211d5ee7bf4d1fa71db96179a4f3c29066248db0de71","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328730Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328730Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"That Dot on the Screen: also, what about Born? and other objections to wavefunction physics","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.gen-ph","authors_text":"W. David Wick","submitted_at":"2025-04-22T17:13:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper I address the most common objections to the claim that Schrodinger was right in 1926: the wavefunction provides the correct, and complete, description of atomic phenomena. I suggest that the line of droplets in the Wilson cloud chamber, the click of the ``photon detector\", and ``that dot on the screen\" can all be explained within a context of wavefunction models and Schrodinger's-type equations, albeit nonlinear. No auxiliary hypotheses about point particles or probabilities are required. The random locations of the triggered ``particle detectors\" can be explained by ``chaos\" (me"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.17808","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.17808/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.17808","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.17808v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.17808","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4MYVD43P7NQL","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4MYVD43P7NQLRHPY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4MYVD43P","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328793+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2403.13699","citing_title":"On blocking Dispersion of Matter by Energy conservation","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4MYVD43P"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4MYVD43P","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.17808&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4MYVD43P7NQLRHPYEEOV5Z57JU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328793+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:53:56.328793+00:00"}