{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK","short_pith_number":"pith:4NTYD5ZH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e36781f72797d328defc7e9d8b16326a98947dfb8f2bba2a91f92749848f2b7b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1907.04368","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Spinning up planetary bodies by pebble accretion","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.EP","authors_text":"C. Dominik, C.W. Ormel, R.G. Visser, S. Ida","submitted_at":"2019-07-09T18:50:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Most major planetary bodies in the solar system rotate in the same direction as their orbital motion: their spin is prograde. Theoretical studies to explain the direction as well as the magnitude of the spin vector have had mixed success. When the accreting building blocks are $\\sim$ km-size planetesimals -- as predicted by the classical model -- the accretion process is so symmetric that it cancels out prograde with retrograde spin contributions, rendering the net spin minute. For this reason, the currently-favored model for the origin of planetary rotation is the giant impact model, in which"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1907.04368","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.EP","submitted_at":"2019-07-09T18:50:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bd78616cc75a82f28107327a5eefb9f752588cbda2da1c3ab51661dd5db95153","abstract_canon_sha256":"82d15c95164420700ae9772020f1079fbb174d7268724fc9c571be527440b0a9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799935Z","signature_b64":"w53aM66A17zT9txorAnzeeXCiW/Ac9WCLaLGBuFiXm0lFNoWShDiGOBG+TiyC4osWcCG0B4vMf/kos625AnzBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e36781f72797d328defc7e9d8b16326a98947dfb8f2bba2a91f92749848f2b7b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799457Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799457Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Spinning up planetary bodies by pebble accretion","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.EP","authors_text":"C. Dominik, C.W. Ormel, R.G. Visser, S. Ida","submitted_at":"2019-07-09T18:50:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Most major planetary bodies in the solar system rotate in the same direction as their orbital motion: their spin is prograde. Theoretical studies to explain the direction as well as the magnitude of the spin vector have had mixed success. When the accreting building blocks are $\\sim$ km-size planetesimals -- as predicted by the classical model -- the accretion process is so symmetric that it cancels out prograde with retrograde spin contributions, rendering the net spin minute. For this reason, the currently-favored model for the origin of planetary rotation is the giant impact model, in which"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1907.04368","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1907.04368/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1907.04368","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799514+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1907.04368v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799514+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1907.04368","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799514+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4NTYD5ZHS7JS","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799514+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799514+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4NTYD5ZH","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799514+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.02785","citing_title":"Accretion of Uranus and Neptune: confronting different giant impact scenarios","ref_index":56,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4NTYD5ZH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4NTYD5ZH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1907.04368&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4NTYD5ZHS7JSRXX4P2OYWFRSNK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799514+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:06:48.799514+00:00"}