{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT","short_pith_number":"pith:4ODHHUQ2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e38673d21a75fcb102d499a50b6a8764c1ba22a434edc0757ffbc9017e8a1865","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.15242","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Causal machine learning methods and use of cross-fitting in settings with high-dimensional confounding","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"John B. Carlin, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Stijn Vansteelandt, Susan Ellul","submitted_at":"2024-05-24T06:08:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Observational epidemiological studies commonly seek to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. Adjustment for potential confounding bias in modern studies is challenging due to the presence of high-dimensional confounding, which occurs when there are many confounders relative to sample size or complex relationships between continuous confounders and exposure and outcome. Doubly robust methods such as Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) have the potential to address these challenges, using data-adaptive approaches and"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.15242","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2024-05-24T06:08:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1dde0ae8eb1ad07465ae6b4ac78f434c8cd70f0d98ecabc07d4d90b7c15a8043","abstract_canon_sha256":"04c72f74f8c5e8a3ec7251c773c89bef66bf866da5b2bbc551f5e2b7c9fbdd3e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.639032Z","signature_b64":"in0WYIZdtpiWfTxyWcFNR63C1eXQ/ZGsKwm1c2gP7D9wIqPB7JzqlRDQSD/eWyFTg8ta6/pnguKJ2NFKW6G7Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e38673d21a75fcb102d499a50b6a8764c1ba22a434edc0757ffbc9017e8a1865","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638525Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638525Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Causal machine learning methods and use of cross-fitting in settings with high-dimensional confounding","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"John B. Carlin, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Stijn Vansteelandt, Susan Ellul","submitted_at":"2024-05-24T06:08:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Observational epidemiological studies commonly seek to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. Adjustment for potential confounding bias in modern studies is challenging due to the presence of high-dimensional confounding, which occurs when there are many confounders relative to sample size or complex relationships between continuous confounders and exposure and outcome. Doubly robust methods such as Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) have the potential to address these challenges, using data-adaptive approaches and"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.15242","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.15242/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.15242","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638590+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.15242v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638590+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.15242","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638590+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4ODHHUQ2OX6L","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638590+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWU","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638590+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4ODHHUQ2","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638590+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.21777","citing_title":"Efficient Estimation of Causal Effects Under Two-Phase Sampling with Error-Prone Outcome and Treatment Measurements","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4ODHHUQ2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4ODHHUQ2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.15242&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODHHUQ2OX6LCAWUTGSQW2UHMT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638590+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:00:25.638590+00:00"}