{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364","short_pith_number":"pith:4ODWRBS4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e38768865cd0dfb9e4f4280273689bf70b692d1afaeace528020059809b55676","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1702.02600","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Eric Huff, Rachel Mandelbaum","submitted_at":"2017-02-08T20:06:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"One of the primary limiting sources of systematic uncertainty in forthcoming weak lensing measurements is systematic uncertainty in the quantitative relationship between the distortions due to gravitational lensing and the measurable properties of galaxy images. We present a statistically principled, general solution to this problem. Our technique infers multiplicative shear calibration parameters by modifying the actual survey data to simulate the effects of a known shear. It can be applied to any shear estimation method based on weighted averages of galaxy shape measurements, which includes "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1702.02600","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2017-02-08T20:06:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c84768984a3c63502eb6427c782e67cc537cbc6f3e5f1634bb21a7727a48ae1f","abstract_canon_sha256":"aaf5e21344f329fe75640dc1391cfd3037234588ae5600be7d419c4880bf614f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:51:03.903952Z","signature_b64":"kEitPni9FCA3Pd7ltvm+6VjfFERYNJJvW3KMzclta6bW/iHCsU6BujVoBu/+xQ3/gQMCKJJqSYvpLFl1rLTvAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e38768865cd0dfb9e4f4280273689bf70b692d1afaeace528020059809b55676","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:51:03.903532Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:51:03.903532Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Eric Huff, Rachel Mandelbaum","submitted_at":"2017-02-08T20:06:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"One of the primary limiting sources of systematic uncertainty in forthcoming weak lensing measurements is systematic uncertainty in the quantitative relationship between the distortions due to gravitational lensing and the measurable properties of galaxy images. We present a statistically principled, general solution to this problem. Our technique infers multiplicative shear calibration parameters by modifying the actual survey data to simulate the effects of a known shear. It can be applied to any shear estimation method based on weighted averages of galaxy shape measurements, which includes "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1702.02600","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1702.02600","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:51:03.903616+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1702.02600v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:51:03.903616+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1702.02600","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:51:03.903616+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4ODWRBS42DP3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:00.734936+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4ODWRBS42DP3TZHU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:00.734936+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4ODWRBS4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:00.734936+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":8,"internal_anchor_count":4,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2105.13549","citing_title":"Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing","ref_index":151,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.13312","citing_title":"Multi-Tracer Cross-Correlations of the Unresolved $\\gamma$-Ray Sky","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13543","citing_title":"UNIONS-3500 Weak Lensing: IV. 2D cosmological constraints in harmonic space","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13547","citing_title":"UNIONS-3500 Weak Lensing: III. 2D Cosmological Constraints in Configuration Space","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03227","citing_title":"UNIONS-3500 Weak Lensing: II. B-mode validation for cosmic shear","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11658","citing_title":"GI BAO as a cosmological consistency check","ref_index":59,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26015","citing_title":"Kinematic Lensing Ratio: Reviving Weak Lensing Cosmography as a Geometric Dark Energy Probe","ref_index":75,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06587","citing_title":"Constraining Galaxy Cluster Triaxiality via Weak Lensing -- I. Preparation for the Rubin Data Beyond Leading Order","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4ODWRBS4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4ODWRBS4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1702.02600&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4ODWRBS42DP3TZHUFABHG2E364/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:51:03.903616+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:51:03.903616+00:00"}