{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA","short_pith_number":"pith:4OUCVAIN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e3a82a810d9d5c221a9d72942a8fa09828a2478d6e21b0e3f3cb673625c3f28a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.12848","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Applicability of Large Language Models and Generative Models for Legal Case Judgement Summarization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aniket Deroy, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh","submitted_at":"2024-07-06T04:49:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Automatic summarization of legal case judgements, which are known to be long and complex, has traditionally been tried via extractive summarization models. In recent years, generative models including abstractive summarization models and Large language models (LLMs) have gained huge popularity. In this paper, we explore the applicability of such models for legal case judgement summarization. We applied various domain specific abstractive summarization models and general domain LLMs as well as extractive summarization models over two sets of legal case judgements from the United Kingdom (UK) Su"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.12848","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-07-06T04:49:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"941a52fa8df0666ab0f6d4e626d30b82b9aa97d881caead2f0a09152080ff145","abstract_canon_sha256":"33e9fae0c248a666bb7362e0039db0e542e5fe8f943a3e54cbf5246a4ce69e3e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053971Z","signature_b64":"vD2wKwVEPcM2ehl8uMt3TqmW/2oAJTvcECmLLBo5aGeH/07552ZazDxt7+uAH7/YxARdXrlQjdp6K58yID64AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e3a82a810d9d5c221a9d72942a8fa09828a2478d6e21b0e3f3cb673625c3f28a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053574Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053574Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Applicability of Large Language Models and Generative Models for Legal Case Judgement Summarization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aniket Deroy, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh","submitted_at":"2024-07-06T04:49:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Automatic summarization of legal case judgements, which are known to be long and complex, has traditionally been tried via extractive summarization models. In recent years, generative models including abstractive summarization models and Large language models (LLMs) have gained huge popularity. In this paper, we explore the applicability of such models for legal case judgement summarization. We applied various domain specific abstractive summarization models and general domain LLMs as well as extractive summarization models over two sets of legal case judgements from the United Kingdom (UK) Su"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.12848","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.12848/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.12848","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053628+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.12848v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053628+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.12848","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053628+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4OUCVAINTVOC","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053628+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053628+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4OUCVAIN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053628+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27331","citing_title":"Maat: The Agentic Legal Research Assistant for Competition Protection","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4OUCVAIN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4OUCVAIN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.12848&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4OUCVAINTVOCEGU5OKKCVD5ATA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053628+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:28.053628+00:00"}