{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS","short_pith_number":"pith:4P23IAND","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e3f5b401a386f54a68fcc809f70b594cae80f22349bd0b6d295b1015ccb7af2c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1202.1251","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Next-to-Leading-Order Event Generators","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Bryan Webber, Paolo Nason","submitted_at":"2012-02-06T19:43:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"We review the methods developed for combining the parton shower approximation to QCD with fixed-order perturbation theory, in such a way as to achieve next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy for inclusive observables. This has made it possible to generate fully-simulated hadronic final states with the precision and stability of NLO calculations. We explain the underlying theory of the existing methods, MC@NLO and POWHEG, together with their similarities, differences, achievements and limitations. For illustration we mainly compare results on Higgs boson production at the LHC, with particular emph"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1202.1251","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2012-02-06T19:43:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex"],"title_canon_sha256":"a6a67a182a2e0aace887e6b5974fcbab8f73eb90cd1ca69b4bc65e7fe67ec982","abstract_canon_sha256":"b28cd2ae1b5c1be0a87985b2837b6f3253baeda2ca6484d1f2912db3760ae29f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:33.322452Z","signature_b64":"+E8bI1k/RvV2qtuysEZaqi8JU/oqdJjIM4hZAyozsBnsDiucSqdzhUG8Opu5wEGoPRX3QnD2fN9x7l6MhcbFDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e3f5b401a386f54a68fcc809f70b594cae80f22349bd0b6d295b1015ccb7af2c","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:33.321839Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:33.321839Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Next-to-Leading-Order Event Generators","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Bryan Webber, Paolo Nason","submitted_at":"2012-02-06T19:43:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"We review the methods developed for combining the parton shower approximation to QCD with fixed-order perturbation theory, in such a way as to achieve next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy for inclusive observables. This has made it possible to generate fully-simulated hadronic final states with the precision and stability of NLO calculations. We explain the underlying theory of the existing methods, MC@NLO and POWHEG, together with their similarities, differences, achievements and limitations. For illustration we mainly compare results on Higgs boson production at the LHC, with particular emph"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1202.1251","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1202.1251","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:33.321959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1202.1251v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:33.321959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1202.1251","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:33.321959+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4P23IANDQ32U","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:53.410803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4P23IANDQ32UU2H4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:53.410803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4P23IAND","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:53.410803+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1405.0301","citing_title":"The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations","ref_index":189,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4P23IAND"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4P23IAND","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1202.1251&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4P23IANDQ32UU2H4ZAE7OC2ZJS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:33.321959+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:58:33.321959+00:00"}