{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU","short_pith_number":"pith:4Q3I55PD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e4368ef5e32661b7b33dba32d497f9ad38afd1496fce751dd3ed451748c75741","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1611.07478","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"An unexpected unity among methods for interpreting model predictions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Scott Lundberg, Su-In Lee","submitted_at":"2016-11-22T19:30:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding why a model made a certain prediction is crucial in many data science fields. Interpretable predictions engender appropriate trust and provide insight into how the model may be improved. However, with large modern datasets the best accuracy is often achieved by complex models even experts struggle to interpret, which creates a tension between accuracy and interpretability. Recently, several methods have been proposed for interpreting predictions from complex models by estimating the importance of input features. Here, we present how a model-agnostic additive representation of the"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1611.07478","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2016-11-22T19:30:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"9b55e1b33f6cc308e38a86a307d310408b88ba8fa61ef34fb372b8e25c0f0afe","abstract_canon_sha256":"f0c5c3374ae6c36cfcc086db25733ceeb45d97c9008cb04bca4b3dd459b8f887"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:55:33.824071Z","signature_b64":"h5FSLe+iOYwqRQFQCPdIfkpjeKXFTkfFOLrF5oFIRmw4ZElmLboewV6qzm/Og0B5gL6A7A59PYVwixVtXlE4AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e4368ef5e32661b7b33dba32d497f9ad38afd1496fce751dd3ed451748c75741","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:55:33.823534Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:55:33.823534Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"An unexpected unity among methods for interpreting model predictions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Scott Lundberg, Su-In Lee","submitted_at":"2016-11-22T19:30:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding why a model made a certain prediction is crucial in many data science fields. Interpretable predictions engender appropriate trust and provide insight into how the model may be improved. However, with large modern datasets the best accuracy is often achieved by complex models even experts struggle to interpret, which creates a tension between accuracy and interpretability. Recently, several methods have been proposed for interpreting predictions from complex models by estimating the importance of input features. Here, we present how a model-agnostic additive representation of the"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1611.07478","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1611.07478","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:55:33.823609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1611.07478v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:55:33.823609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1611.07478","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:55:33.823609+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4Q3I55PDEZQ3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:58.707656+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:58.707656+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4Q3I55PD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:58.707656+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.03039","citing_title":"Global Aggregations of Local Explanations for Black Box models","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4Q3I55PD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4Q3I55PD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1611.07478&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4Q3I55PDEZQ3PMZ5XIZNJF7ZVU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:55:33.823609+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:55:33.823609+00:00"}