{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5","short_pith_number":"pith:4R5T2TAH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e47b3d4c0781c00d5da859e146248d0f44b32ae4a06d693eacf0295812ab88c7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.00024","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do Emotions Really Affect Argument Convincingness? A Dynamic Approach with LLM-based Manipulation Checks","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Steffen Eger, Yanran Chen","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T10:04:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Emotions have been shown to play a role in argument convincingness, yet this aspect is underexplored in the natural language processing (NLP) community. Unlike prior studies that use static analyses, focus on a single text domain or language, or treat emotion as just one of many factors, we introduce a dynamic framework inspired by manipulation checks commonly used in psychology and social science; leveraging LLM-based manipulation checks, this framework examines the extent to which perceived emotional intensity influences perceived convincingness. Through human evaluation of arguments across "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.00024","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T10:04:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"6b978d9df6287f5c974cdc97414621cd551d8783d79a02df570529cfc20dd317","abstract_canon_sha256":"e01eecf6f060bd77317df43f99218b216e4d04afd2edf37a4b6c0ff37fa7e539"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.326159Z","signature_b64":"Hgq6aA/OAUejDM7OxyMfKqtAQV33+gbsv9YXbn96QHe69tzLw0II9fvBFAYatXjTLa6MQHdwhD23SaUEKYmSCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e47b3d4c0781c00d5da859e146248d0f44b32ae4a06d693eacf0295812ab88c7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325716Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325716Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do Emotions Really Affect Argument Convincingness? A Dynamic Approach with LLM-based Manipulation Checks","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Steffen Eger, Yanran Chen","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T10:04:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Emotions have been shown to play a role in argument convincingness, yet this aspect is underexplored in the natural language processing (NLP) community. Unlike prior studies that use static analyses, focus on a single text domain or language, or treat emotion as just one of many factors, we introduce a dynamic framework inspired by manipulation checks commonly used in psychology and social science; leveraging LLM-based manipulation checks, this framework examines the extent to which perceived emotional intensity influences perceived convincingness. Through human evaluation of arguments across "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.00024","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.00024/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.00024","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.00024v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.00024","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4R5T2TAHQHAA","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325767+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4R5T2TAH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325767+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.03870","citing_title":"Evaluating Apple Intelligence's Writing Tools for Privacy Against Large Language Model-Based Inference Attacks: Insights from Early Datasets","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4R5T2TAH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4R5T2TAH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.00024&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4R5T2TAHQHAA2XNILHQUMJENB5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325767+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:33.325767+00:00"}