{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47","short_pith_number":"pith:4R72UUBN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e47faa502d7362637f4d32d809998be7d0cd0316c7981e981e057519796135e2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2202.08536","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Are There Exceptions to Goodhart's Law? On the Moral Justification of Fairness-Aware Machine Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Hilde Weerts, Lamb\\`er Royakkers, Mykola Pechenizkiy","submitted_at":"2022-02-17T09:26:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fairness-aware machine learning (fair-ml) techniques are algorithmic interventions designed to ensure that individuals who are affected by the predictions of a machine learning model are treated fairly. The problem is often posed as an optimization problem, where the objective is to achieve high predictive performance under a quantitative fairness constraint. However, any attempt to design a fair-ml algorithm must assume a world where Goodhart's law has an exception: when a fairness measure becomes an optimization constraint, it does not cease to be a good measure. In this paper, we argue that"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2202.08536","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-02-17T09:26:39Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"2659a43934564dfed44317369b73a1d940ae0420434a6a8c897864358d626f6a","abstract_canon_sha256":"4a21b7dd140f4ae861202b146137c6c74f22befa278e2a327af7cfa56931eaab"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.175348Z","signature_b64":"D0Dlc/ifeanyVjHyeuMcvI8Snq0c69ikRBFVvMRZJEvykiE6YTExP2AQmHWhCtaeO2Indv3E0xBbdkrw4VqVCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e47faa502d7362637f4d32d809998be7d0cd0316c7981e981e057519796135e2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174882Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174882Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Are There Exceptions to Goodhart's Law? On the Moral Justification of Fairness-Aware Machine Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Hilde Weerts, Lamb\\`er Royakkers, Mykola Pechenizkiy","submitted_at":"2022-02-17T09:26:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fairness-aware machine learning (fair-ml) techniques are algorithmic interventions designed to ensure that individuals who are affected by the predictions of a machine learning model are treated fairly. The problem is often posed as an optimization problem, where the objective is to achieve high predictive performance under a quantitative fairness constraint. However, any attempt to design a fair-ml algorithm must assume a world where Goodhart's law has an exception: when a fairness measure becomes an optimization constraint, it does not cease to be a good measure. In this paper, we argue that"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2202.08536","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2202.08536/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2202.08536","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174936+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2202.08536v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174936+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2202.08536","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174936+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4R72UUBNONRG","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174936+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4R72UUBNONRGG72N","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174936+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4R72UUBN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174936+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.17525","citing_title":"Transparency and Proportionality in Post-Processing Algorithmic Bias Correction","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4R72UUBN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4R72UUBN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2202.08536&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4R72UUBNONRGG72NGLMATGML47/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174936+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:50.174936+00:00"}