{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ","short_pith_number":"pith:4S42QOOQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e4b9a839d078041f64c1f72afbcdfb4e6d5669861e4ca99960303af9858d127c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.04108","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparing second-order gravitational self-force and effective-one-body waveforms from inspiralling, quasi-circular black hole binaries with a non-spinning primary and a spinning secondary","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Alessandro Nagar, Angelica Albertini, Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Josh Mathews","submitted_at":"2024-06-06T14:25:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present the first comparison of waveforms evaluated using the effective-one-body (EOB) approach and gravitational self-force (GSF) theory for inspiralling black hole binaries with a non-spinning primary and a spinning secondary. This paper belongs to a series of papers comparing the EOB model TEOBResumS to GSF results, where the latter are used to benchmark the EOB analytical choices in the large-mass-ratio regime. In this work, we explore the performance of two gauge choices for the gyro-gravitomagnetic functions GS, GS* entering the spin-orbit sector within the EOB dynamics. In particular"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.04108","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2024-06-06T14:25:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a1d77ea7e841c43b9eac0fd387a5e836b1f134e95e32fc260bc9275c1ec08f11","abstract_canon_sha256":"30f05a62f8a55dc7ffe272623bc93c17e84fa76994541abcef3cc65326c0f8b2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.930017Z","signature_b64":"6C57OSCtqAVMaem+xJ7mCljwHYxtGl/MWpYZPv2ztIXEyGjMLurC/iy0Lt9NTNMrxUyvesPhfmCMY6JTkAANBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e4b9a839d078041f64c1f72afbcdfb4e6d5669861e4ca99960303af9858d127c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929542Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929542Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparing second-order gravitational self-force and effective-one-body waveforms from inspiralling, quasi-circular black hole binaries with a non-spinning primary and a spinning secondary","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Alessandro Nagar, Angelica Albertini, Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Josh Mathews","submitted_at":"2024-06-06T14:25:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present the first comparison of waveforms evaluated using the effective-one-body (EOB) approach and gravitational self-force (GSF) theory for inspiralling black hole binaries with a non-spinning primary and a spinning secondary. This paper belongs to a series of papers comparing the EOB model TEOBResumS to GSF results, where the latter are used to benchmark the EOB analytical choices in the large-mass-ratio regime. In this work, we explore the performance of two gauge choices for the gyro-gravitomagnetic functions GS, GS* entering the spin-orbit sector within the EOB dynamics. In particular"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.04108","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.04108/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.04108","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929599+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.04108v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929599+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.04108","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929599+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4S42QOOQPACB","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929599+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929599+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4S42QOOQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929599+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.30594","citing_title":"Efficient Eccentric Effective-One-Body Dynamics via Near-Identity Averaging Transformations","ref_index":162,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28937","citing_title":"Quadrupole and quadratic-in-spin effects in quasicircular, spinning, asymmetric binaries","ref_index":109,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.16113","citing_title":"Post-adiabatic self-force waveforms: slowly spinning primary and precessing secondary","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4S42QOOQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4S42QOOQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.04108&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4S42QOOQPACB6ZGB64VPXTP3JZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929599+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:20.929599+00:00"}