{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7","short_pith_number":"pith:4TORAI6M","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e4dd1023cc83168b5420adc81b0c7997d152fa1b923993c41e40a9a19fed79b8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2006.06364","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Blurred quantum Darwinism across quantum reference frames","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Pawe{\\l} Horodecki, Piotr Mironowicz, Thao P. Le","submitted_at":"2020-06-11T12:30:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum Darwinism describes objectivity of quantum systems via their correlations with their environment--information that hypothetical observers can recover by measuring the environments. However, observations are done with respect to a frame of reference. Here, we take the formalism of [Giacomini, Castro-Ruiz, & Brukner. Nat Commun 10, 494 (2019)], and consider the repercussions on objectivity when changing quantum reference frames. We find that objectivity depends on non-degenerative relative separations, conditional state localisation, and environment macro-fractions. There is different ob"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2006.06364","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2020-06-11T12:30:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"6123262bcc1d86ee4f30c91476bf7e28886a096131f2e0b697e1ba0ab684d4a4","abstract_canon_sha256":"9d0020e414e584866c516c5b5e2b56a5b6b04787f18e3fd5f140f0f1f13669d2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045604Z","signature_b64":"nplQeCWZ3W7dIFi1V3oUQT6sCw2OrfBi/yDzyRKqbXtCYKNOgSoEaiS6cNI7AOM+jGkT2RA9MD52nTz63nw+BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e4dd1023cc83168b5420adc81b0c7997d152fa1b923993c41e40a9a19fed79b8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045217Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045217Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Blurred quantum Darwinism across quantum reference frames","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Pawe{\\l} Horodecki, Piotr Mironowicz, Thao P. Le","submitted_at":"2020-06-11T12:30:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum Darwinism describes objectivity of quantum systems via their correlations with their environment--information that hypothetical observers can recover by measuring the environments. However, observations are done with respect to a frame of reference. Here, we take the formalism of [Giacomini, Castro-Ruiz, & Brukner. Nat Commun 10, 494 (2019)], and consider the repercussions on objectivity when changing quantum reference frames. We find that objectivity depends on non-degenerative relative separations, conditional state localisation, and environment macro-fractions. There is different ob"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2006.06364","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2006.06364/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2006.06364","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2006.06364v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2006.06364","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4TORAI6MQMLI","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4TORAI6MQMLIWVBA","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045273+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4TORAI6M","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045273+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1908.08818","citing_title":"Witnessing non-objectivity in the framework of strong quantum Darwinism","ref_index":59,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4TORAI6M"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4TORAI6M","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2006.06364&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4TORAI6MQMLIWVBAVXEBWDDZS7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045273+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:04:08.045273+00:00"}