{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU","short_pith_number":"pith:4WF2XJFS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e58baba4b278fdc9fd40fe2b06890c6519137f891eab756758b6a98ac150e241","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2001.05485","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Review and Examination of Input Feature Preparation Methods and Machine Learning Models for Turbulence Modeling","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.comp-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.flu-dyn","authors_text":"Enyi Jiang, Jiahuan Cui, Jian Liu, Madhu Vellakal, Seid Koric, Shirui Luo, Volodymyr Kindratenko","submitted_at":"2020-01-15T18:54:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Model extrapolation to unseen flow is one of the biggest challenges facing data-driven turbulence modeling, especially for models with high dimensional inputs that involve many flow features. In this study we review previous efforts on data-driven Reynolds-Averaged Naiver Stokes (RANS) turbulence modeling and model extrapolation, with main focus on the popular methods being used in the field of transfer learning. Several potential metrics to measure the dissimilarity between training flows and testing flows are examined. Different Machine Learning (ML) models are compared to understand how the"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2001.05485","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.flu-dyn","submitted_at":"2020-01-15T18:54:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.comp-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"0c1db1ced779ae0f3348be08df5b4a044134f4f3705cf735912bbc5b8e54200f","abstract_canon_sha256":"76ff197c53ef6801d25ac4fdccb520f0abe51b55701b18a0055aa2db3ff55d45"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.714178Z","signature_b64":"ICy/H7BtSm326BoHKudnXci51+NOAwIMxlaCyUjmY9x2vYXIoCurDM1VT1eb/ZsO1mrUc+HfBSKvZFwyrX7FBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e58baba4b278fdc9fd40fe2b06890c6519137f891eab756758b6a98ac150e241","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713731Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713731Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Review and Examination of Input Feature Preparation Methods and Machine Learning Models for Turbulence Modeling","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.comp-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.flu-dyn","authors_text":"Enyi Jiang, Jiahuan Cui, Jian Liu, Madhu Vellakal, Seid Koric, Shirui Luo, Volodymyr Kindratenko","submitted_at":"2020-01-15T18:54:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Model extrapolation to unseen flow is one of the biggest challenges facing data-driven turbulence modeling, especially for models with high dimensional inputs that involve many flow features. In this study we review previous efforts on data-driven Reynolds-Averaged Naiver Stokes (RANS) turbulence modeling and model extrapolation, with main focus on the popular methods being used in the field of transfer learning. Several potential metrics to measure the dissimilarity between training flows and testing flows are examined. Different Machine Learning (ML) models are compared to understand how the"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2001.05485","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2001.05485/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2001.05485","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2001.05485v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2001.05485","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4WF2XJFSPD64","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713793+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4WF2XJFS","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713793+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.02976","citing_title":"Extending deep learning U-Net architecture for predicting unsteady fluid flows in textured microchannels","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4WF2XJFS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4WF2XJFS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2001.05485&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4WF2XJFSPD64T7KA7YVQNCIMMU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713793+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:33:42.713793+00:00"}