{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU","short_pith_number":"pith:4Y2FRHZX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e634589f37f8e17b29c2ca8e582714bd239b856610cb4bf8fde971fd65a8e769","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.01895","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Evaluating System 1 vs. 2 Reasoning Approaches for Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasting: A Benchmark and Insights","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"B. Aditya Prakash, Haoxin Liu, Shiduo Li, Zhiyuan Zhao","submitted_at":"2025-02-27T23:27:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reasoning ability is crucial for solving challenging tasks. With the advancement of foundation models, such as the emergence of large language models (LLMs), a wide range of reasoning strategies has been proposed, including test-time enhancements, such as Chain-ofThought, and post-training optimizations, as used in DeepSeek-R1. While these reasoning strategies have demonstrated effectiveness across various challenging language or vision tasks, their applicability and impact on time-series forecasting (TSF), particularly the challenging zero-shot TSF, remain largely unexplored. In particular, i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.01895","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-02-27T23:27:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"29d1957ed1d1f60373481abd63d3cda2c4d1e3d8a66f758c147e6c839019a254","abstract_canon_sha256":"4a9762b156ec1be450b37b3a2d03b42830eec074309ea8d812d193ba00626876"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.814398Z","signature_b64":"t946lOFl5LvdtghxKt1osFHp3tUY3/pdCor5lCYwhaNf1D0+L46/RcmVexkxynZcU7Qdjr//Xx9oeHce7ixcCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e634589f37f8e17b29c2ca8e582714bd239b856610cb4bf8fde971fd65a8e769","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813903Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813903Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Evaluating System 1 vs. 2 Reasoning Approaches for Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasting: A Benchmark and Insights","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"B. Aditya Prakash, Haoxin Liu, Shiduo Li, Zhiyuan Zhao","submitted_at":"2025-02-27T23:27:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reasoning ability is crucial for solving challenging tasks. With the advancement of foundation models, such as the emergence of large language models (LLMs), a wide range of reasoning strategies has been proposed, including test-time enhancements, such as Chain-ofThought, and post-training optimizations, as used in DeepSeek-R1. While these reasoning strategies have demonstrated effectiveness across various challenging language or vision tasks, their applicability and impact on time-series forecasting (TSF), particularly the challenging zero-shot TSF, remain largely unexplored. In particular, i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.01895","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.01895/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.01895","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.01895v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.01895","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4Y2FRHZX7DQX","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOC","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4Y2FRHZX","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813962+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.10630","citing_title":"Time Series Forecasting as Reasoning: A Slow-Thinking Approach with Reinforced LLMs","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4Y2FRHZX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4Y2FRHZX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.01895&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4Y2FRHZX7DQXWKOCZKHFQJYUXU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813962+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:01.813962+00:00"}