{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL","short_pith_number":"pith:4YES6GGI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e6092f18c8f7e4e8f52e92b03ac72432f75f29032dd94d6c62c373dbcf919147","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2009.13807","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Current Time Series Anomaly Detection Benchmarks are Flawed and are Creating the Illusion of Progress","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Eamonn J. Keogh, Renjie Wu","submitted_at":"2020-09-29T06:29:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Time series anomaly detection has been a perennially important topic in data science, with papers dating back to the 1950s. However, in recent years there has been an explosion of interest in this topic, much of it driven by the success of deep learning in other domains and for other time series tasks. Most of these papers test on one or more of a handful of popular benchmark datasets, created by Yahoo, Numenta, NASA, etc. In this work we make a surprising claim. The majority of the individual exemplars in these datasets suffer from one or more of four flaws. Because of these four flaws, we be"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2009.13807","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2020-09-29T06:29:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"bb203198571a52e66af4816ff0c70f226d577204c5f897bd06adf22478119a71","abstract_canon_sha256":"ebab08f4948d427e5623d3f787a3ae3e1087b282e2c1e07888f116c9ae5fdb8a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.430113Z","signature_b64":"0Z9qB6F6g3Gg5fLP6wYSSeSbgSuNdJFSoaB6NMHfLNFFf7284DmeNkEITGyv6V+LxYhOm5/8SzNriJI49sr4DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e6092f18c8f7e4e8f52e92b03ac72432f75f29032dd94d6c62c373dbcf919147","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429187Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429187Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Current Time Series Anomaly Detection Benchmarks are Flawed and are Creating the Illusion of Progress","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Eamonn J. Keogh, Renjie Wu","submitted_at":"2020-09-29T06:29:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Time series anomaly detection has been a perennially important topic in data science, with papers dating back to the 1950s. However, in recent years there has been an explosion of interest in this topic, much of it driven by the success of deep learning in other domains and for other time series tasks. Most of these papers test on one or more of a handful of popular benchmark datasets, created by Yahoo, Numenta, NASA, etc. In this work we make a surprising claim. The majority of the individual exemplars in these datasets suffer from one or more of four flaws. Because of these four flaws, we be"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2009.13807","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2009.13807/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2009.13807","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429724+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2009.13807v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429724+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2009.13807","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429724+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4YES6GGI67SO","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429724+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4YES6GGI67SOR5JO","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429724+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4YES6GGI","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429724+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06094","citing_title":"Modeling Normal Is All You Need: Joint Latent Clustering for Anomaly Detection in Multimodal Cyber-Physical Systems","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4YES6GGI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4YES6GGI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2009.13807&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4YES6GGI67SOR5JOSKYDVRZEGL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429724+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:12.429724+00:00"}