{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW","short_pith_number":"pith:4YRCUSU3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e6222a4a9bac4e0332d95e35109ebfa5bbbdf151282c16f5cc735640dd8d8fc9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.01427","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The effect of diversity on group decision-making","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andreas Vlachos, Georgi Karadzhov, Tom Stafford","submitted_at":"2024-02-02T14:15:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"We explore different aspects of cognitive diversity and its effect on the success of group deliberation. To evaluate this, we use 500 dialogues from small, online groups discussing the Wason Card Selection task - the DeliData corpus. Leveraging the corpus, we perform quantitative analysis evaluating three different measures of cognitive diversity. First, we analyse the effect of group size as a proxy measure for diversity. Second, we evaluate the effect of the size of the initial idea pool. Finally, we look into the content of the discussion by analysing discussed solutions, discussion pattern"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.01427","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-02T14:15:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b5d33c04bafe95ad35efe6d06988a0d925aa79353f009dfd5795cfc5462d3681","abstract_canon_sha256":"01861b9caf1f146ea523d996672ee8da2d9eb48c9ced703d94710e9a0cd2b783"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.711411Z","signature_b64":"41EJYetSRKRr3UEk4BwUb8NSascqYPmmcQaH6/SNcJyfcezG6MccCFcBOw0fAZfpLt4cXeMYAKG9qEjPgiIGBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e6222a4a9bac4e0332d95e35109ebfa5bbbdf151282c16f5cc735640dd8d8fc9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710904Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710904Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The effect of diversity on group decision-making","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andreas Vlachos, Georgi Karadzhov, Tom Stafford","submitted_at":"2024-02-02T14:15:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"We explore different aspects of cognitive diversity and its effect on the success of group deliberation. To evaluate this, we use 500 dialogues from small, online groups discussing the Wason Card Selection task - the DeliData corpus. Leveraging the corpus, we perform quantitative analysis evaluating three different measures of cognitive diversity. First, we analyse the effect of group size as a proxy measure for diversity. Second, we evaluate the effect of the size of the initial idea pool. Finally, we look into the content of the discussion by analysing discussed solutions, discussion pattern"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.01427","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.01427/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.01427","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.01427v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.01427","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4YRCUSU3VRHA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4YRCUSU3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710968+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04987","citing_title":"DeliChess: A Multi-party Dialogue Dataset for Deliberation in Chess Puzzle Solving","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4YRCUSU3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4YRCUSU3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.01427&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4YRCUSU3VRHAGMWZLY2RBHV7UW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710968+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:20:52.710968+00:00"}