{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C","short_pith_number":"pith:53NRKXTN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"eedb155e6db1cca9fa73023606c6bee88fa6223cee2bc8380d29e602ec2fac7a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.18772","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Difference-in-differences Design with Outcomes Missing Not at Random","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.EM","stat.AP"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Sooahn Shin","submitted_at":"2024-11-27T21:53:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper addresses one of the most prevalent problems encountered by political scientists working with difference-in-differences (DID) design: missingness in panel data. A common practice for handling missing data, known as complete case analysis, is to drop cases with any missing values over time. A more principled approach involves using nonparametric bounds on causal effects or applying inverse probability weighting based on baseline covariates. Yet, these methods are general remedies that often under-utilize the assumptions already imposed on panel structure for causal identification. In"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.18772","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2024-11-27T21:53:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["econ.EM","stat.AP"],"title_canon_sha256":"3fee80b1ebee8b2ba9fca361fb19a12ec1523ee61c0c6b422487e58f12276ef0","abstract_canon_sha256":"3d5f8d50d8b0d7350de9bf3f55248395a4c66870eea1438481fe6910106ab635"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.429013Z","signature_b64":"d+g5UMGHwQYNjwJbNl67sYwBA75ix3uqT5b9OuAsNyMH1i/FoUhL++h9LVt31kNjSMtKES389trIZ00KornFBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"eedb155e6db1cca9fa73023606c6bee88fa6223cee2bc8380d29e602ec2fac7a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428431Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428431Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Difference-in-differences Design with Outcomes Missing Not at Random","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.EM","stat.AP"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Sooahn Shin","submitted_at":"2024-11-27T21:53:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper addresses one of the most prevalent problems encountered by political scientists working with difference-in-differences (DID) design: missingness in panel data. A common practice for handling missing data, known as complete case analysis, is to drop cases with any missing values over time. A more principled approach involves using nonparametric bounds on causal effects or applying inverse probability weighting based on baseline covariates. Yet, these methods are general remedies that often under-utilize the assumptions already imposed on panel structure for causal identification. In"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.18772","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.18772/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.18772","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428509+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.18772v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428509+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.18772","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428509+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"53NRKXTNWHGK","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428509+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"53NRKXTNWHGKT6TT","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428509+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"53NRKXTN","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428509+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08474","citing_title":"Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimation With Missing Not at Random Data: A Shadow Variable Approach","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.00504","citing_title":"Conformal Inference for Experimental Attrition in Social Science Research","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C","json":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/53NRKXTN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/53NRKXTN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.18772&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/53NRKXTNWHGKT6TTAI3ANRV65C/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428509+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:41:51.428509+00:00"}