{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC","short_pith_number":"pith:56QSRPEB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"efa128bc81189832f9b0ab2677597c10b34134a9f0fa7609d79ccf22e4ed4285","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1405.7703","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum limits in optical interferometry","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"J. Kolodynski, M. Jarzyna, R. Demkowicz-Dobrzanski","submitted_at":"2014-05-29T20:00:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Non-classical states of light find applications in enhancing the performance of optical interferometric experiments, with notable example of gravitational wave-detectors. Still, the presence of decoherence hinders significantly the performance of quantum-enhanced protocols. In this review, we summarize the developments of quantum metrology with particular focus on optical interferometry and derive fundamental bounds on achievable quantum-enhanced precision in optical interferometry taking into account the most relevant decoherence processes including: phase diffusion, losses and imperfect inte"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1405.7703","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2014-05-29T20:00:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"919c3ddccdc922fd9b600d0e4744c303334662b6ef19ffb87feb22e04b2923af","abstract_canon_sha256":"4379fef63b963dba07ef74be756b1eeeb953fa0b7f997a84d6854ba503504837"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:01.101329Z","signature_b64":"ds0xNlTYp3ikoKipfWI2FFC4hhqO+gbpDhjv63p9UTxUeIseaFFXnZm8LJgIj5Eui0HlcQLOsPud12mta2yXAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"efa128bc81189832f9b0ab2677597c10b34134a9f0fa7609d79ccf22e4ed4285","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:01.100814Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:01.100814Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum limits in optical interferometry","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"J. Kolodynski, M. Jarzyna, R. Demkowicz-Dobrzanski","submitted_at":"2014-05-29T20:00:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Non-classical states of light find applications in enhancing the performance of optical interferometric experiments, with notable example of gravitational wave-detectors. Still, the presence of decoherence hinders significantly the performance of quantum-enhanced protocols. In this review, we summarize the developments of quantum metrology with particular focus on optical interferometry and derive fundamental bounds on achievable quantum-enhanced precision in optical interferometry taking into account the most relevant decoherence processes including: phase diffusion, losses and imperfect inte"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1405.7703","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1405.7703","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:01.100890+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1405.7703v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:01.100890+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1405.7703","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:01.100890+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"56QSRPEBDCMD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:14.216126+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:14.216126+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"56QSRPEB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:14.216126+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":4,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2206.02820","citing_title":"Iterative optimization in quantum metrology and entanglement theory using semidefinite programming","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2203.03064","citing_title":"Complex Field Formulation of the Quantum Estimation Theory","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18392","citing_title":"Precision limits for time-dependent quantum metrology under Markovian noise","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.14523","citing_title":"Quantum Wasserstein distance and its relation to several types of fidelities","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03027","citing_title":"Relations between different definitions of the quantum Wasserstein distance for qubits","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03022","citing_title":"General method for obtaining the energy minimum of spin Hamiltonians for separable states","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/56QSRPEB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/56QSRPEB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1405.7703&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/56QSRPEBDCMDF6NQVMTHOWL4CC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:01.100890+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:01.100890+00:00"}