{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG","short_pith_number":"pith:5ATCYBGH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e8262c04c7a464d13e5c3a88a1d9b2018d49afe3579ec9bdde05051acc49d03e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2603.14066","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Benchmark for Multi-Party Negotiation Games from Real Negotiation Data","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"No solver dominates multi-party negotiation games; performance varies with each game's structural properties.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Finale Doshi-Velez, Jonas Raedler, Leo Benac, Zilin Ma","submitted_at":"2026-03-14T18:12:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many real-world multi-party negotiations unfold as sequences of binding, action-level commitments rather than a single final outcome, yet this regime remains under-studied in existing benchmarks. We introduce a benchmark and evaluation framework for this setting, combining a configurable negotiation game generator with document-grounded instances derived from a climate negotiation exercise. We also provide several baseline solvers. Exact evaluation on small games and comparative evaluation on larger instances show that no solver dominates across regimes; performance depends on the structural p"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2603.14066","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2026-03-14T18:12:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"398300e5ae5c995f00273ada5120934c76ec44f682d340cb26a264fa022fd777","abstract_canon_sha256":"97c3d779307b7f6250866f9c21c216ff2397624508f58db80048f7cb68614cec"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.759274Z","signature_b64":"i79t286eWJjuUJD719E6/PTCahMMAsMnHKcnHrdEYvhFael3p7zXhPrQms8Dtq2TQEjfTZcatwmn4RgyO3/iBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e8262c04c7a464d13e5c3a88a1d9b2018d49afe3579ec9bdde05051acc49d03e","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.758523Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.758523Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Benchmark for Multi-Party Negotiation Games from Real Negotiation Data","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"No solver dominates multi-party negotiation games; performance varies with each game's structural properties.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Finale Doshi-Velez, Jonas Raedler, Leo Benac, Zilin Ma","submitted_at":"2026-03-14T18:12:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many real-world multi-party negotiations unfold as sequences of binding, action-level commitments rather than a single final outcome, yet this regime remains under-studied in existing benchmarks. We introduce a benchmark and evaluation framework for this setting, combining a configurable negotiation game generator with document-grounded instances derived from a climate negotiation exercise. We also provide several baseline solvers. Exact evaluation on small games and comparative evaluation on larger instances show that no solver dominates across regimes; performance depends on the structural p"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Exact evaluation on small games and comparative evaluation on larger instances show that no solver dominates across regimes; performance depends on the structural properties of the game.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the configurable game generator and document-grounded instances from the climate negotiation exercise faithfully capture the dynamics of real-world multi-party sequential commitments.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"A new benchmark for sequential multi-party negotiations from climate data shows no solver dominates and performance depends on game structure.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"No solver dominates multi-party negotiation games; performance varies with each game's structural properties.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"42b7069177443434e668d1b82be2aa1904975702e1159bf695c8c40506b63b0e"},"source":{"id":"2603.14066","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"dace04ce-b5bc-4cb1-9c66-33ca343e2b2b","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T11:25:48.027159Z","strongest_claim":"Exact evaluation on small games and comparative evaluation on larger instances show that no solver dominates across regimes; performance depends on the structural properties of the game.","one_line_summary":"A new benchmark for sequential multi-party negotiations from climate data shows no solver dominates and performance depends on game structure.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the configurable game generator and document-grounded instances from the climate negotiation exercise faithfully capture the dynamics of real-world multi-party sequential commitments.","pith_extraction_headline":"No solver dominates multi-party negotiation games; performance varies with each game's structural properties."},"references":{"count":18,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Haris Aziz and Bart de Keijzer","work_id":"7aa995a2-48cd-4796-b183-59e3496790f2","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2010,"title":"Complexity of coalition structure generation","work_id":"c498742e-edb1-445e-ac7b-c86795943253","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"1101.1007","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-24696-8_7","year":null,"title":"DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24696-8_7. Max H. Bazerman, Jared R. Curhan, Don A. Moore, and Kathleen L. Valley. Negotiation.Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1):279–314,","work_id":"bcf52e45-3e34-4c12-ad14-f2894d402b93","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.279","year":null,"title":"Centre of Competence on Humanitarian Negotiation.CCHN Field Manual on Humanitarian Nego- tiation","work_id":"3ac2260f-4fd2-419f-b4f3-90380fc0a3de","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2026,"title":"org/document/cchn-field-manual-english/","work_id":"3fc13906-9fcf-40e6-8ae7-8aa7c6c30b74","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":18,"snapshot_sha256":"b35e03c0485f7733b19d214fd34d4508a61dded1b26e938d546d13663b323a44","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"dd9e386b15a9b23048de608e5428eef689e8904d7c49d73134119080a3002d37"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.14066","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.758640+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.14066v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.758640+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.14066","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.758640+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5ATCYBGHURSN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5ATCYBGH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5ATCYBGH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5ATCYBGH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2603.14066&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5ATCYBGHURSNCPS4HKEKDWNSAG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.758640+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:22.758640+00:00"}