{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ","short_pith_number":"pith:5FP2M6GG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e95fa678c6b0398a5fb61541f08166b662ab0d12d6ef67f13f9cd5b7e3ee62ee","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1602.08971","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Alternating Set Quantifiers in Modal Logic","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.FL","math.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Fabian Reiter","submitted_at":"2016-02-29T14:16:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"We establish the strictness of several set quantifier alternation hierarchies that are based on modal logic, evaluated on various classes of finite graphs. This extends to the modal setting a celebrated result of Matz, Schweikardt and Thomas (2002), which states that the analogous hierarchy of monadic second-order logic is strict.\n  Thereby, the present paper settles a question raised by van Benthem (1983), revived by ten Cate (2006), and partially answered by Kuusisto (2008, 2015)."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1602.08971","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2016-02-29T14:16:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.FL","math.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"c450fb7e7cb3959437837a2cb61d64bbf7daff91fce4e3bcaf549c4544bcd293","abstract_canon_sha256":"011cfb01fbf3b4b54546b96b5c2516ff8b27834cbb8a999be432240d258356b9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:51.579616Z","signature_b64":"nH476FBXXIPrT/4MugPe9Dvsb54WDQWGCc2ny9vV1hL3beaEa3Kx0dg/Rd5j9/Fi5oigHgWzoCkykmYi+JAmAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e95fa678c6b0398a5fb61541f08166b662ab0d12d6ef67f13f9cd5b7e3ee62ee","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:51.578993Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:51.578993Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Alternating Set Quantifiers in Modal Logic","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.FL","math.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Fabian Reiter","submitted_at":"2016-02-29T14:16:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"We establish the strictness of several set quantifier alternation hierarchies that are based on modal logic, evaluated on various classes of finite graphs. This extends to the modal setting a celebrated result of Matz, Schweikardt and Thomas (2002), which states that the analogous hierarchy of monadic second-order logic is strict.\n  Thereby, the present paper settles a question raised by van Benthem (1983), revived by ten Cate (2006), and partially answered by Kuusisto (2008, 2015)."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1602.08971","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1602.08971","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:51.579084+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1602.08971v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:51.579084+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1602.08971","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:51.579084+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5FP2M6GGWA4Y","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:01.593930+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5W","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:01.593930+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5FP2M6GG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:01.593930+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5FP2M6GG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5FP2M6GG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1602.08971&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5FP2M6GGWA4YUX5WCVA7BALGWZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:51.579084+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:51.579084+00:00"}