{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2009:5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC","short_pith_number":"pith:5H43IUMR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e9f9b45191f7665b89ec2b348d74f860acae43d605667265f581abac13deafdf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"0912.1128","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"How to Explain Individual Classification Decisions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"David Baehrens, Katja Hansen, Klaus-Robert Mueller, Motoaki Kawanabe, Stefan Harmeling, Timon Schroeter","submitted_at":"2009-12-06T19:29:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"After building a classifier with modern tools of machine learning we typically have a black box at hand that is able to predict well for unseen data. Thus, we get an answer to the question what is the most likely label of a given unseen data point. However, most methods will provide no answer why the model predicted the particular label for a single instance and what features were most influential for that particular instance. The only method that is currently able to provide such explanations are decision trees. This paper proposes a procedure which (based on a set of assumptions) allows to e"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"0912.1128","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2009-12-06T19:29:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"db97a0426dd0e3c4001d31d8176dfad1298c58d24842070413a6f64171082208","abstract_canon_sha256":"fcbe4a88272f2eaa4e37046b00e41c66cc149379fe9f498abe088ba21e8f0f61"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830452Z","signature_b64":"x20/qp2ASGhEri6cyzYL6s249AGAEY3REta9JcRx3s7NHT8MrBWLb5sXnM95raQlo9lZtwCP9OWzzI3jBs+mBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e9f9b45191f7665b89ec2b348d74f860acae43d605667265f581abac13deafdf","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830041Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830041Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"How to Explain Individual Classification Decisions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"David Baehrens, Katja Hansen, Klaus-Robert Mueller, Motoaki Kawanabe, Stefan Harmeling, Timon Schroeter","submitted_at":"2009-12-06T19:29:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"After building a classifier with modern tools of machine learning we typically have a black box at hand that is able to predict well for unseen data. Thus, we get an answer to the question what is the most likely label of a given unseen data point. However, most methods will provide no answer why the model predicted the particular label for a single instance and what features were most influential for that particular instance. The only method that is currently able to provide such explanations are decision trees. This paper proposes a procedure which (based on a set of assumptions) allows to e"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"0912.1128","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/0912.1128/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"0912.1128","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"0912.1128v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.0912.1128","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5H43IUMR65TF","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5H43IUMR65TFXCPM","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5H43IUMR","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830098+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.28154","citing_title":"Mapping data sensitivities in global QCD analysis with linear response and influence functions","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5H43IUMR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5H43IUMR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=0912.1128&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5H43IUMR65TFXCPMFM2I25HYMC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830098+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T17:17:14.830098+00:00"}