{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG","short_pith_number":"pith:5JCUVZ7L","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ea454ae7eb1704a7bde4ea934d561091b9d925aeb0d16df1b0822491e0c8971b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.23847","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Seven Security Challenges That Must be Solved in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Chuan Xiao, Jiseong Jeong, Makoto Onizuka, Ronny Ko, Shuyuan Zheng, Tae-Wan Kim, Won-Yong Shin","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T18:19:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving into autonomous agents that cooperate across organizational boundaries, enabling joint disaster response, supply-chain optimization, and other tasks that demand decentralized expertise without surrendering data ownership. Yet, cross-domain collaboration shatters the unified trust assumptions behind current alignment and containment techniques. An agent benign in isolation may, when receiving messages from an untrusted peer, leak secrets or violate policy, producing risks driven by emergent multi-agent dynamics rather than classical software bug"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.23847","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T18:19:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"e36c8603fe040d47805acd150e07de9ebba38586fbb692c39871701fffac5738","abstract_canon_sha256":"2e17c9a94f09fc083be886ee8d5275dd2cc1570d97aa2f7e5a86763428d928e4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609660Z","signature_b64":"swyDenPg8ByGZx1CPRuEsQH2Bi7dLovtcz9ZK2uQvlhQjNEIawbntSSF13eJ/RzyVTGkfOxXLUwAyHIakYidCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ea454ae7eb1704a7bde4ea934d561091b9d925aeb0d16df1b0822491e0c8971b","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609167Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609167Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Seven Security Challenges That Must be Solved in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Chuan Xiao, Jiseong Jeong, Makoto Onizuka, Ronny Ko, Shuyuan Zheng, Tae-Wan Kim, Won-Yong Shin","submitted_at":"2025-05-28T18:19:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving into autonomous agents that cooperate across organizational boundaries, enabling joint disaster response, supply-chain optimization, and other tasks that demand decentralized expertise without surrendering data ownership. Yet, cross-domain collaboration shatters the unified trust assumptions behind current alignment and containment techniques. An agent benign in isolation may, when receiving messages from an untrusted peer, leak secrets or violate policy, producing risks driven by emergent multi-agent dynamics rather than classical software bug"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.23847","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.23847/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.23847","created_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.23847v4","created_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.23847","created_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5JCUVZ7LC4CK","created_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE","created_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5JCUVZ7L","created_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609226+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":4,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10749","citing_title":"Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.23883","citing_title":"Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges","ref_index":109,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.07407","citing_title":"A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15367","citing_title":"SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce","ref_index":91,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5JCUVZ7L"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5JCUVZ7L","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.23847&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5JCUVZ7LC4CKPPPE5KJU2VQQSG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609226+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-29T01:14:02.609226+00:00"}